#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2nd nuts 350BB deep vs nit
Against a nit, what's the point of 3-betting this river? Is a 15/7 really calling with worse?
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2nd nuts 350BB deep vs nit
wow. i guess he hasa straightflush. but... wtf.
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2nd nuts 350BB deep vs nit
[ QUOTE ]
Against a nit, what's the point of 3-betting this river? Is a 15/7 really calling with worse? [/ QUOTE ] |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2nd nuts 350BB deep vs nit
he's not bluffing because he would have had to have raised the river for value in the first place, which he's not doing.
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2nd nuts 350BB deep vs nit
fold, quick!
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2nd nuts 350BB deep vs nit
fold
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2nd nuts 350BB deep vs nit
I much prefer min 3betting on the river as opposed to making a normal raise as he's more likely to call w/ what you want him to call with which I don't know what it is.
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2nd nuts 350BB deep vs nit
This is a simple hand. Who cares if you have fking quads when you can't put villain on a hand you beat. Fairly basic hand reading, just put yourself in villains shoes and put him on a range. Villain is a nit and isn't bluffing for four buy ins here. It's almost impossible that he is bad enough to value shove the jack of diamonds here. I mean come on lol. Villain has the straight flush here more than 99.5% of the time.
/thread. fwiw you should all check out the thread on the same hand in uNL. The amount of posters saying call is embarassing. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2nd nuts 350BB deep vs nit
foollddddd.
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2nd nuts 350BB deep vs nit
[ QUOTE ]
It's almost impossible that he is bad enough to value shove the jack of diamonds here. I mean come on lol. [/ QUOTE ] Umm, a shove with the Jd would obv not be for value. |
|
|