#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 5/10: Go passive or go aggressive?
[ QUOTE ]
it's tough to tell from just numbers. there are some 40/30 guys with whom i'd love to go multiple bets here(especially with fish coming along). against others it's a pretty easy call down. default is probably call down i guess. [/ QUOTE ] Can you define the difference between those two types of players. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 5/10: Go passive or go aggressive?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] it's tough to tell from just numbers. there are some 40/30 guys with whom i'd love to go multiple bets here(especially with fish coming along). against others it's a pretty easy call down. default is probably call down i guess. [/ QUOTE ] Can you define the difference between those two types of players. [/ QUOTE ] what i mean is the pf numbers alone don't tell me all i want to know about postflop aggression. i've played with some 40/30 guys that are near maniacal postflop (they'll cap this flop with any pair/draw). some other 40/30 guys are more passive and will just call this flop with most worse hands. i said i'd probably call just based on pf numbers, but i think i wanna change my vote to 3 bet. but a better read could change this |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 5/10: Go passive or go aggressive?
i go passive on this board pretty much always
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 5/10: Go passive or go aggressive?
isnt this a prefect wa/wb situation?
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 5/10: Go passive or go aggressive?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] it's tough to tell from just numbers. there are some 40/30 guys with whom i'd love to go multiple bets here(especially with fish coming along). against others it's a pretty easy call down. default is probably call down i guess. [/ QUOTE ] Can you define the difference between those two types of players. [/ QUOTE ] what i mean is the pf numbers alone don't tell me all i want to know about postflop aggression. i've played with some 40/30 guys that are near maniacal postflop (they'll cap this flop with any pair/draw). some other 40/30 guys are more passive and will just call this flop with most worse hands. i said i'd probably call just based on pf numbers, but i think i wanna change my vote to 3 bet. but a better read could change this [/ QUOTE ] Well he's not suicidal. He plays good draws aggressively maybe even raise/caps them here. He's raising queens/aces here but probably not 7's. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 5/10: Go passive or go aggressive?
[ QUOTE ]
isnt this a prefect wa/wb situation? [/ QUOTE ] i don't think so. wa/wb works better in HU pots. also, depending on the LAGs postflop tendencies, there is a good chance we are much more often WA than WB. and if we are ahead, there are plenty of draws that either of them can have, so we are not normally WA |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 5/10: Go passive or go aggressive?
[ QUOTE ]
isnt this a prefect wa/wb situation? [/ QUOTE ] no -it's 3-way -there are lots of gutshots and a FD -we aren't "wa" of a Q WA/WB mostly applies to HU situations when villain has 3 or less outs or you have 3 or less outs. |
|
|