books - sexually active main characters

[99killed]

i wasnt aware that they still made books.

[diebitter]

I think things used to be more liberal actually. For example, I can't see anyone being able to publish a book with this title in this century anytime soon.

[smokingrobot]

um in nabokov's lolita, wasnt she about 12? iforget, its been a while since i read it.

[killsadie]

like how [censored] stupid do you have to be think of this stuff?

[benza13]

[ QUOTE ]
I wasn't sexually active when I was 17, so it's not really hard for me to believe that Harry isn't sleeping around.

[/ QUOTE ]

Plus wizards would obviously be nerds, adding to the unlikeliness of his sexing anyone.

[ursine cotcher]

[ QUOTE ]
so you are telling me that your biggest factual problem with a book about wizards and dragons and [censored] is that the main characters dont [censored] each other? yes, that is the only part of the book that doesn't match real life.

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't know whether it's the phrasing of this or whatever but I actually just spat tea all over my monitors

[phydaux]

[ QUOTE ]
um in nabokov's lolita, wasnt she about 12?

[/ QUOTE ]

She was 13.

Not that I'm, um... I heard that she was 13.

[manupod]

[ QUOTE ]
so you are telling me that your biggest factual problem with a book about wizards and dragons and [censored] is that the main characters dont [censored] each other? yes, that is the only part of the book that doesn't match real life.

[/ QUOTE ]

[ursine cotcher]

[React1oN]

Dean Moriarty