Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Micro Stakes
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 02-24-2007, 09:54 PM
udbrky udbrky is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Having adventures 40 hrs/week
Posts: 1,008
Default Re: Hand reading 101 - LC but not NC

If he had AA or JJ, the flop overbet push is quite puzzling.

Did you get hurt when you tripped trying to get to the call button?
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 02-24-2007, 10:18 PM
Sean Fraley Sean Fraley is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Ohio, United States
Posts: 974
Default Re: Hand reading 101 - LC but not NC

Sorry, I missed the limp-reraise when I was reading it. These are easy to recognize at the table, but I sometimes miss them in posts. This is almost always AA or KK.

Fold.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 02-24-2007, 10:25 PM
Lordy Lordy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: I\'m a crazy nit!
Posts: 610
Default Re: Hand reading 101 - LC but not NC

Push pre-flop or call flop.
If you really think his range is EXACTLY {AA, KK} you should fold pre-flop. You aren't getting odds for set-value.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 02-24-2007, 10:31 PM
ImprovinNewbie ImprovinNewbie is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Looking for MY luckbox
Posts: 873
Default Re: Hand reading 101 - LC but not NC

JJ, QQ, also KK but HIGHLY unlikely, and AA... the only other hand i put him on is AJ in the hands of a donk.... i do call here. i dont like it.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 02-24-2007, 10:34 PM
ImprovinNewbie ImprovinNewbie is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Looking for MY luckbox
Posts: 873
Default Re: Hand reading 101 - LC but not NC

i didnt notice the limp RR in the post.... that tightens the range a lot. i also think only to AA pretty much... maybe people do this with kings but ive only seen it done with AA.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 02-24-2007, 10:36 PM
Johnny Drama Johnny Drama is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 799
Default Re: Hand reading 101 - LC but not NC

did everyone notice that CO limped behind two limpers and then reraised? it's been my experience that this is a real hand a LOT less often than an open-limp/reraise.

I call this all day.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 02-24-2007, 11:07 PM
Sean Fraley Sean Fraley is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Ohio, United States
Posts: 974
Default Re: Hand reading 101 - LC but not NC

[ QUOTE ]
did everyone notice that CO limped behind two limpers and then reraised? it's been my experience that this is a real hand a LOT less often than an open-limp/reraise.


[/ QUOTE ]

Your experience and mine appear to differ drastically. I've never seen a single limp-reraise that wasn't at least QQ, and that was only one time.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 02-25-2007, 01:14 AM
haz31 haz31 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 193
Default Re: Hand reading 101 - LC but not NC

fold preflop if you wont felt this on a non-ace flop
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 02-25-2007, 01:36 AM
spacetime spacetime is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: i love rakeback
Posts: 575
Default Re: Hand reading 101 - LC but not NC

I don't agree with thoughts like this. Its called gaining information and using it to determine whether or not you are ahead. I am not saying that he should fold here, I am saying that IN GENERAL the lack of an overcard to Hero's pair does not make everything fine and dandy.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 02-25-2007, 06:10 AM
Freelancer Freelancer is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Embrace the variance !!
Posts: 2,215
Default Re: Hand reading 101 - LC but not NC

ugh I'd snapcall the flop.

The assumption that every limp/reraise is AA/KK is EXTREMELY dangerous both for your development and decisions. A while back there was a thread in I believe mid stakes about limp reraises from datamined stats and what hands villain would do this with. To most people's suprise it was a mix of AA/KK and occasionally QQ but also A LOT of junk, since junk will get to showdown way less often than a big pair you would have to assume that this is junk atleast half the time (whoaa yeah seriously). Now this might not be correct at these stakes, but your hand is WAY to strong to depend so much on the general tendency of players.

If its a mistake to call with KK here its a very marginal one (based on basic math KK is going to be good most of the time EVEN against a lrr), if its a mistake to fold with KK here its a very big one...



Meh I'm fairly that some people are going to berate me for this but whatever. Preventing big mistakes is more important that preventing small ones, if you agree with me that it is close either way (I hope you do) than a call is obviously the better option (this will never be a big mistake).




Ps. Ask any random 2p2'er if its a big mistake if you never fold KK in a 3bet pot on a non-ace flop, I'd bet 99% would say its a marginal mistake at best. Now ask the if its a big mistake if you occasionally fold KK in a 3bet pot on a non-ace flop, now the answers will be A LOT more diverse.
Pss. I am often snapcalling open pushes in decent sized pots with every big pair, its amazing how often air shows up here. Also its obv. that villain had AA in this example, this means extremely little though. [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:21 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.