What the anarchcapitalists need to understand: Moral clarity

[The once and future king]

Its such a yawn having to ask this again.

Could you explain the link between terrorism, islamic fundamentalism and Iraq?

Also in the context of the any link you do supply, why did we attack Iraq and not Iran?

[mosdef]

[ QUOTE ]
Its such a yawn having to ask this again.

Could you explain the link between terrorism, islamic fundamentalism and Iraq?

Also in the context of the any link you do supply, why did we attack Iraq and not Iran?

[/ QUOTE ]

God told Bush that the letter "q" was evil. How many Christian priests have a "q" in their name? How many Islamic terrorists? Think about it.

[Steven Bickford]

[ QUOTE ]
Worst. Pro-government argument. Ever.

[/ QUOTE ]

Better than no argument at all, which is what your post consists of.

How bout we move this discussion to a more concrete question: If there is no government, who will prevent terrorists from setting off a nuclear bomb in a major US city? You? Borodog?

[Nielsio]

Without government, who would impose the moral clarity of genocide?


Good point sir. You win the prize.

[Steven Bickford]

[ QUOTE ]
Its such a yawn having to ask this again.

Could you explain the link between terrorism, islamic fundamentalism and Iraq?[/qoute]

Are you joking?

[ QUOTE ]

Also in the context of the any link you do supply, why did we attack Iraq and not Iran?

[/ QUOTE ]

Iraq was simply the best target to hit first. If Iran continues down the path that it is on now, it should be next.

[mosdef]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Worst. Pro-government argument. Ever.

[/ QUOTE ]

Better than no argument at all, which is what your post consists of.

How bout we move this discussion to a more concrete question: If there is no government, who will prevent terrorists from setting off a nuclear bomb in a major US city? You? Borodog?

[/ QUOTE ]

Dude, you're lobbing softballs to them to whack out of the park.

1. My private army will do a better job of protecting me than a general army if I'm rich enough, and if I'm rich and I don't give a [censored] about you than why should the government have the right to take my money away to defend you?

2. The actions of the government are responsible for the global hate of the U.S.

[Nielsio]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Worst. Pro-government argument. Ever.

[/ QUOTE ]

Better than no argument at all, which is what your post consists of.

How bout we move this discussion to a more concrete question: If there is no government, who will prevent terrorists from setting off a nuclear bomb in a major US city? You? Borodog?

[/ QUOTE ]


If there is no government, then there are no people setting off nuclear bombs in cities; given that states (and specifically the United States) are the only one doing it, and more specifically: profiting from it.


Damn, you're on fire.

[hmkpoker]

At least our usual thug camp has the decency to logically critique our views on the gold standard, price floors, private security, and taxes. Your argument is simply "it's wrong, therefore it's wrong."

[ QUOTE ]

The fact is that we need a government leaders that have moral clarity and are willing to fight for it. George Bush is the perfect example of a leader with moral clarity. Bush saw the threat being posed by dictators and Islamic fundamentalists and had the courage to take action against it by confronting Saddam Hussien. Yes the war in Iraq is not going perfectly, but the world is better off now that a brutal dictator is gone and the world understands that America is willing to fight for freedom and democracy world wide.

[/ QUOTE ]

This paragraph has permanently discredited any opinion you may have, and any post you will ever have in the future to this forum.

[Nielsio]

[ QUOTE ]
At least our usual thug camp has the decency to logically critique our views on the gold standard, price floors, private security, and taxes. Your argument is simply "it's wrong, therefore it's wrong."

[ QUOTE ]

The fact is that we need a government leaders that have moral clarity and are willing to fight for it. George Bush is the perfect example of a leader with moral clarity. Bush saw the threat being posed by dictators and Islamic fundamentalists and had the courage to take action against it by confronting Saddam Hussien. Yes the war in Iraq is not going perfectly, but the world is better off now that a brutal dictator is gone and the world understands that America is willing to fight for freedom and democracy world wide.

[/ QUOTE ]

This paragraph has permanently discredited any opinion you may have, and any post you will ever have in the future to this forum.

[/ QUOTE ]


I'm pretty sure this guy is heading for BANNEDSVILLE.

[Steven Bickford]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Worst. Pro-government argument. Ever.

[/ QUOTE ]

Better than no argument at all, which is what your post consists of.

How bout we move this discussion to a more concrete question: If there is no government, who will prevent terrorists from setting off a nuclear bomb in a major US city? You? Borodog?

[/ QUOTE ]


If there is no government, then there are no people setting off nuclear bombs in cities; given that states (and specifically the United States) are the only one doing it, and more specifically: profiting from it.


Damn, you're on fire.

[/ QUOTE ]

What government is Osama Bin Laden a part of?

And just saying: if there were no government.... is not an answer to my question. Right now there are dangerous governments. You cannot just snap your fingers and get rid of them.