![]() |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Is this THEORIES or stuff that can be backed up 100%?
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I am sure Boosted could back this THEORIES up for a 100%.
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] not pattern mapping, rakeback induced collusion [/ QUOTE ] huh [/ QUOTE ] he would play HU with a freind, and they'd just trade money while getting 100% rakeback, so they both always won. [/ QUOTE ] Either I'm an idiot for not realizing how this is +EV rather then zero sum or you just levelled me (hey it is 5am). Or both, I can't tell anymore. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
I am sure Boosted could back this THEORIES up for a 100%. [/ QUOTE ] Are you saying that Boosted is the kinda guy who knows about dodgy dealings in poker?? |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
Is this THEORIES or stuff that can be backed up 100%? [/ QUOTE ] Rakeback induced collusion is 100% true. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] wat's pattern mapping btw? [/ QUOTE ] A theory that computer programs can predict what cards are going to come on the turn or river, or at least what cards are likely to come. Really just another "online poker is rigged and everyone cheats" theory. [/ QUOTE ] It's so much more than that. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Even if he and his friend could really get 100% rakeback (which I doubt), they would break even, not "always win".
Some of you people are too dumb to be allowed to post. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] not pattern mapping, rakeback induced collusion [/ QUOTE ] huh [/ QUOTE ] he would play HU with a freind, and they'd just trade money while getting 100% rakeback, so they both always won. [/ QUOTE ] Either I'm an idiot for not realizing how this is +EV rather then zero sum or you just levelled me (hey it is 5am). Or both, I can't tell anymore. [/ QUOTE ] it is not +EV, its a zero sum. You are correct. This theory makes no sense. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
110% rakeback is the answer we were looking for. 110% rakeback.
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] not pattern mapping, rakeback induced collusion [/ QUOTE ] huh [/ QUOTE ] he would play HU with a freind, and they'd just trade money while getting 100% rakeback, so they both always won. [/ QUOTE ] Either I'm an idiot for not realizing how this is +EV rather then zero sum or you just levelled me (hey it is 5am). Or both, I can't tell anymore. [/ QUOTE ] it is not +EV, its a zero sum. You are correct. This theory makes no sense. [/ QUOTE ] obv they get 110% RB, otherwise it just wouldn't make any sense. Use your heads guys. |
![]() |
|
|