#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: down $3000 in 895 hands at 300NL
there is no such thing as 300nl
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: down $3000 in 895 hands at 300NL
I know, this is all an elaborate hoax. I even broke a bunch of stuff to make it seem real. And I'm still playing chasing my imaginary losses...
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: down $3000 in 895 hands at 300NL
Looks OK, I played a hand similar once:
** Game ID 729750363 starting - 2007-04-15 02:53:06 ** Heidegger [Hold 'em] (1.00|2.00 No Limit - Cash Game) Real Money - muppet sitting in seat 1 with $669.56 - spillihp34 sitting in seat 3 with $194.35 - flyfish sitting in seat 4 with $363.20 [Dealer] - SinkRox sitting in seat 5 with $910.89 - vivajo sitting in seat 6 with $191.00 SinkRox posted the small blind - $1.00 vivajo posted the big blind - $2.00 ** Dealing card to SinkRox: K[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] 5[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] muppet raised - $4.00 spillihp34 folded flyfish folded SinkRox called - $4.00 vivajo folded ** Dealing the flop: 9[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 3[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] k[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] ($10) SinkRox bet - $10.00 muppet raised - $40.00 SinkRox called - $40.00 ** Dealing the turn: A [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] ($90) SinkRox checked muppet bet - $90.00 SinkRox called - $90.00 ** Dealing the river: 9[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] SinkRox checked muppet bet - $270.00 SinkRox called - $270.00 muppet shows: 5[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] 7[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] SinkRox shows: K[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] 5[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] SinkRox wins $808.00 from the main pot |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: down $3000 in 895 hands at 300NL
The pitfalls of loose-passive.
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: down $3000 in 895 hands at 300NL
OP, you suck. You're calling range is far to wide
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: down $3000 in 895 hands at 300NL
[ QUOTE ]
And no that isn't headsup. It's 6-max. Right after the $1000 pot hand, this happened on another table. And this was a misclick PF [yeah right] . I don't call PF hands like this [img]/images/graemlins/smirk.gif[/img] , the K2 was just because of implied odds [O RLY? Implied odds with K2? LOL, study up on "implied odds" , loose PF calls, loose flop & turn calls, and overshoving a weak 2P on draw heavy river] and ultradonkey plays like every single hand. [apparently so do you] I did push because I was tilting. It's nice getting it all in 80% favored after losing a huge pot... [and tilting away another buy in] OP.... |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: down $3000 in 895 hands at 300NL
Are you ultradonkey?
Can't my PF range be more loose if villain has a big stack? Isn't that implied odds since I have a chance to win a bigger pot? I'm not actually sure how/why I called with K2o, I normally wouldn't. Also my VPIP is 20%, compared to villain's 69%. Did you miss the part that he lost $3000 in this session? He was bluffing $300 on rivers, calling with A high, et cetera. He would have played the same way with QQ/AK/A9/88/etc. And yes, tilting another buyin away 80% ahead. I guess I should challenge you to a headsup battle. But I'm not sure it'd be fair. You seem too smart. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: down $3000 in 895 hands at 300NL
please post YOUR PT stats, I CALL BS on 20% vpip and you even possibly being a winnarrr
And I'm not ultradonkey, I dont know what site you play on that spreads 300nl and can't discern it from the hh you posted either |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Re: down $3000 in 895 hands at 300NL
OP
"Isn't that implied odds" Sweet implied odds with K2o dude! |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Re: down $3000 in 895 hands at 300NL
He was probably thinking something like dis:
"K2o is the nuts in a raised pot OOP, If I flop bottom pair of 2's, its usually good, If I'd flopped a King, no way he has a better one when he raised pf right?!?! And with 2 pair, wooohhooo I made my 'implied odds' pay me.... oh wait, where's my Mongies yoo?!!!!" |
|
|