![]() |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
More players on the internet are winners than in live play. That's for sure.
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm most positively a loser at 100NL thus far.
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
I'm winning [/ QUOTE ] though I often wonder if the end is coming [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img] |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Granted I dont have 3455692123485906643 hands in my PT but the 40-60 breakdown seems to be consistent in my stats on other players. Granted its tiny samples on most of them but I am curious if anyone else sees the same trend or not?
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I see 40-60 in mine too.
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm fairly sure I'm a losing player NL200, I am sure I am a winning player at NL50 (like 99.99999% sure) and fairly sure a winning player NL100.
I'm in the process of adapting and learning at NL200 so I'm hopefully a winning player at NL200 in a month or so. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
I'm most positively crushing 100NL thus far. [/ QUOTE ] |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In my current DB I have 5269 players with a total combined of 426,569 hands. Winners 40.43%, losers 59.57%. So on average that's only 80 hands/player. Also, these win or lose stats don't take rakeback/bonusses into account; although probably a big portion of those people don't have it. But the ones who do, really get lifted out of the red zone for a decent margin.
The reason this may convert into the 7% winners in online poker, that was listed somewhere, could be: Winning players play wayyy more hands than losing players. So they're also taking out a *ton* of money. So on an average sample of 80 hands, it's about 45/55 that you win, but on the long term, you're gonna be paying the winners bigtime. For example, the biggest number of hands I have on anyone else in this DB is only 1463. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
or example, the biggest number of hands I have on anyone else in this DB is only 1463. [/ QUOTE ] Really? I have 341000 hands in the DB with a 41 to 58 spread but I have more hands than that on some players Have in order 5300 3500 3000 2700 2000 and about 20 players with 1000-2000 hands each Suprised your top amount on any one player is that low Edit My bad. Didnt read your post correctly the first time |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] or example, the biggest number of hands I have on anyone else in this DB is only 1463. [/ QUOTE ] Really? I have 341000 hands in the DB with a 41 to 58 spread but I have more hands than that on some players Have in order 5300 3500 3000 2700 2000 and about 20 players with 1000-2000 hands each Suprised your top amount on any one player is that low Edit My bad. Didnt read your post correctly the first time [/ QUOTE ] It's probably because I have imported hands from a fellow player as well. |
![]() |
|
|