|
|
#11
03-12-2007, 09:41 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: tricky river spot
220, call push.
|
|
#12
03-12-2007, 09:45 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: tricky river spot
[ QUOTE ]
what do you think about bet of 120 and fold to a shove? That should maximize the value from Ax. We are getting bluffed from time to time, but aren't getting stacked by a flush. [/ QUOTE ] If we bet we should def fold to a shove. I know 200 gives us sick odds if he shoves but that also means he'll almost never bluff raise. If you think 120 is significantly more likely to be called by Ax then sure, but it is also much much more likely to be bluff raised. If this had been 1/2 or lower where the bluff raise haven't been invented yet I like 120 much better. It's about finding the right balance.
|
|
#13
03-12-2007, 09:49 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: tricky river spot
I dont think bet/folding is an option here because of stack sizes. If we bet small he might bluff-raise and if we bet bigger he's not likely to do that at all but might just put the rest in with a worse 2p or something for value/in frustration.
|
|
#14
03-12-2007, 07:00 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: tricky river spot
[ QUOTE ]
I dont think bet/folding is an option here because of stack sizes. If we bet small he might bluff-raise and if we bet bigger he's not likely to do that at all but might just put the rest in with a worse 2p or something for value/in frustration. [/ QUOTE ] I got stacked by Kc9c. I just didn't feel that this was a very good result. Sure, the nut flush is a small part of his range but getting stacked on this board seems suboptimal.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
