#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: i estimate that running -255 BB/100 has saved me about $1K
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Its people like you who make these .02-.04 NL games so profitable. [/ QUOTE ] I suspect that it has more to do with the fact those limits are filled with the worst players on Earth, rather than the occasional player showing up to goof off. And when you call them "profitable", what's the hourly rate you're getting per table there? [/ QUOTE ] level? |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: i estimate that running -255 BB/100 has saved me about $1K
[ QUOTE ]
level? [/ QUOTE ] maybe dunno for sure |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: i estimate that running -255 BB/100 has saved me about $1K
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: i estimate that running -255 BB/100 has saved me about $1K
85/70? Go back to full ring!
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: i estimate that running -255 BB/100 has saved me about $1K
Wow, kewl, you sure run g00t. Maybe it's because of the nittiness?
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: i estimate that running -255 BB/100 has saved me about $1K
so, here is my nl results since i've started playing lhe - clearly Gildy is right, LHE helps your NLHE game:
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: i estimate that running -255 BB/100 has saved me about $1K
Is this your 2cent/4cent limit graph?
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: i estimate that running -255 BB/100 has saved me about $1K
[ QUOTE ]
Is this your 2cent/4cent limit graph? [/ QUOTE ] i would assume |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Re: i estimate that running -255 BB/100 has saved me about $1K
nice w$wsf nit
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Re: i estimate that running -255 BB/100 has saved me about $1K
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Is this your 2cent/4cent limit graph? [/ QUOTE ] i would assume [/ QUOTE ] Sorry the first image didn't load when I first opened the thread. BTW 98/95 is pretty weak-tight. |
|
|