Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Politics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 03-20-2006, 04:47 PM
Tarheel Tarheel is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 476
Default Re: \"donkey\", \"drunkard\": how other world leaders see Bush

Saddam started the first Gulf War on his own accord. We went in and defended Kuwait. We lost American soldiers in that war!! Saddam signed a peace treaty. He didn't live up to the conditions of that treaty. How ridiculous would we be if we let him completely disregard the treaty that he signed? That would mean that every American soldiers life that was lost in the first Gulf War was in vein. We simply had to go back into Iraq, if for nothing else than to make sure our fallen brothers gave their lives for a reason. If you have something constructive to say, say it. Don't just give a silly little computer sigh in a lousy attempt to belittle what i said. Did we defend others? Yes. Are we defending ourselves. Yes. Plain and simple.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-20-2006, 05:06 PM
Roybert Roybert is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 878
Default Re: \"donkey\", \"drunkard\": how other world leaders see Bush

[ QUOTE ]
Saddam started the first Gulf War on his own accord. We went in and defended Kuwait. We lost American soldiers in that war!! Saddam signed a peace treaty. He didn't live up to the conditions of that treaty. How ridiculous would we be if we let him completely disregard the treaty that he signed? That would mean that every American soldiers life that was lost in the first Gulf War was in vein. We simply had to go back into Iraq, if for nothing else than to make sure our fallen brothers gave their lives for a reason.

[/ QUOTE ]

Ok, so the REAL reason we're over there is to defend the sacrifice that 313 American servicemen made 15 years ago? You're right. I should stay out of this discussion because I somehow got the impression that we were over there for other reasons.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 03-20-2006, 05:13 PM
canis582 canis582 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: 1c-2c PLO8
Posts: 3,314
Default Re: \"donkey\", \"drunkard\": how other world leaders see Bush

[ QUOTE ]
Saddam signed a peace treaty. He didn't live up to the conditions of that treaty. How ridiculous would we be if we let him completely disregard the treaty that he signed?

[/ QUOTE ]

I've met people like you before. You don't think the US has ever violated a treaty? LoLasaurus.

I'd love to hear you articulate what it is we are defending ourselves from.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 03-20-2006, 05:14 PM
Wes Mantooth Wes Mantooth is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: DC
Posts: 2,826
Default Re: \"donkey\", \"drunkard\": how other world leaders see Bush

the real reason is its a war for oil, c'mon everyone knows that its the official only reason.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 03-20-2006, 05:22 PM
elwoodblues elwoodblues is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Sweet Home, Chicago
Posts: 4,485
Default Re: \"donkey\", \"drunkard\": how other world leaders see Bush

[ QUOTE ]
Spending and trade deficit - Bad
Quoting Hugo Chavez - Very Bad

[/ QUOTE ]

Quoting Chaves is worse than our spending and deficit?
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 03-20-2006, 06:04 PM
Tarheel Tarheel is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 476
Default Re: \"donkey\", \"drunkard\": how other world leaders see Bush

Jesus. everytime i come back i have 5 people to respond to. Did the European Union just roll through town?

Roybert, I didn't stay out of the discussion at all. I just said say something constructive. If someone posts a hand history you're not gonna respond with "Yeah you would do that" or "Nice try rookie". I don't see how "<sigh>" brings anything to the table. I'm not saying that defending out fallen soldiers honor is the reason that we're there, but it would be a damn good one if it was.

Canis- I don't diagree with you at all. But we could have finished Saddam off the first time. He snaked out of it by signing the accord. Then he just wants to pretend like nothing happened? That shouldn't fly. But you know people like me..huh? Haha. Good. Very good.

Wes- If thats what you want to think.

Elwood- Quoting, no. But you got my point. Actually caring what Chavez has to say is silly.

I just find too many people who love to sit back and say "Bush is an idiot" with nothing else to say. Clinton ordered an attack on Iraq during his presidency also. He turned the jets back around minutes before they dropped the first bombs. So don't just say Bush is an idiot. Bush went to the UN first and made it plain and clear to both them and Iraq his intentions. Clinton almost did it as a sneak attack. And i understand that he didn't go through with it so don't come back and tell me "yeah, but he didn't". All i'm saying is that he was within a fingernail. Is he an idiot too?

All we can really do is look back in 10 or 20 years and see what this actually did for the climate of the world. I personally think it will be for the better and am happy to have Bush as our president.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 03-20-2006, 07:05 PM
MoreWineII MoreWineII is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: 5% chance at Greg Oden
Posts: 4,863
Default Re: \"donkey\", \"drunkard\": how other world leaders see Bush

Huge Chavez is hardly a typical world leader, but I do believe he's voicing what a lot of other world leaders wish they could. And fwiw, I think he's dead on.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 03-20-2006, 08:16 PM
Wussy Woy Wussy Woy is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 19
Default Re: \"donkey\", \"drunkard\": how other world leaders see Bush

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Saddam signed a peace treaty. He didn't live up to the conditions of that treaty. How ridiculous would we be if we let him completely disregard the treaty that he signed?

[/ QUOTE ]

I've met people like you before. You don't think the US has ever violated a treaty? LoLasaurus.

I'd love to hear you articulate what it is we are defending ourselves from.

[/ QUOTE ]


Simple. We're taking the fight to terrorists off US soil. Had we not taken an offensive, do you really think that we wouldn't have been attacked again? Days immediately following 9/11, didn't you honestly expect to get attacked again some other way? I know I did.

Now go ahead an swear that Iraq has no ties to Al-Queda and go on believing that there were no terrorists in Iraq until we went in to take out Sadam.

The fact is, the world will be a safer place with a democracy in Iraq and Afganistan. 50+ million people have been liberated thanks to the USA. Now I'd love to see you articulate what that is such a bad thing.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.