|
|
#11
05-25-2007, 05:11 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Short stacking - better for FR or 6-max?
6 max is even more profitable for ssing but the variance is of course magnified. Please goto 6max if youd like to ss so i dont have to deal with your [censored].
|
|
#12
05-25-2007, 05:17 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Short stacking - better for FR or 6-max?
[ QUOTE ]
Please goto 6max if youd like to ss so i dont have to deal with your [censored]. [/ QUOTE ] LOL! Don't worry too much. I prefer deep stack play because I find it more challenging. I'm just considering SSS for live play or taking shots.
|
|
#16
05-25-2007, 05:30 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Short stacking - better for FR or 6-max?
[ QUOTE ]
Shortstacking doesn't bother me. Shortstackers who hit and run do- I really wish the sites would force them to buy in for what they take away when they join a new table. [/ QUOTE ] PS does
|
|
#17
05-25-2007, 05:47 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Short stacking - better for FR or 6-max?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Shortstacking doesn't bother me. Shortstackers who hit and run do- I really wish the sites would force them to buy in for what they take away when they join a new table. [/ QUOTE ] PS does [/ QUOTE ] I thought that was only if you re-bought back on to the same table? And the whole point of short stacking is to double-up and run.
|
|
#18
05-25-2007, 05:49 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Short stacking - better for FR or 6-max?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Shortstacking doesn't bother me. Shortstackers who hit and run do- I really wish the sites would force them to buy in for what they take away when they join a new table. [/ QUOTE ] PS does [/ QUOTE ] I thought that was only if you re-bought back on to the same table? And the whole point of short stacking is to double-up and run. [/ QUOTE ] It is. and it is.
|
|
#19
05-25-2007, 05:55 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Short stacking - better for FR or 6-max?
[ QUOTE ]
And the whole point of short stacking is to double-up and run. [/ QUOTE ]I guess- I can see some point to buying in short in order to get your feet wet in a new game without a big risk to your bankroll. If that's your goal, no reason to leave after you double up. The hit and run thing is just rat holing in the internet age- the only reason people can get away with it is that there are a gazillion tables they can go out and join. It's a loophole that is counter to the way the game was designed. IMHO, obviously.
|
|
#20
05-25-2007, 06:15 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Short stacking - better for FR or 6-max?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] And the whole point of short stacking is to double-up and run. [/ QUOTE ]I guess- I can see some point to buying in short in order to get your feet wet in a new game without a big risk to your bankroll. If that's your goal, no reason to leave after you double up. The hit and run thing is just rat holing in the internet age- the only reason people can get away with it is that there are a gazillion tables they can go out and join. It's a loophole that is counter to the way the game was designed. IMHO, obviously. [/ QUOTE ] i missunderstood your first statement , carter made it clear but its much worse on party , u double up, leave the table and u can buy in for the minimum on the same table 5 secs later [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img] now that is really annoying imagine u have 3 guys like this on nl5k ^^
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
