|
|
#11
07-13-2007, 03:35 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: The Importance of Position: Hold\'em vs. PLO
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I'll read this later. My unexploitable strategy. Raise preflop, call any reraise, c/r any two pair+ to get all in. [/ QUOTE ] Is your unexploitable strategy unexploitable if you and opponent are at 250 bb? How about if you are OOP vs a passive opponent when one draw hits on the turn and you are both at 150bb? Do you have an unexploitable straregy for that Rolf? [/ QUOTE ] No. C/R FLOP AWW EEEN. I haven't read this article but if you're suggesting there's a universal unexplotable strategy that works for all those depths, yeeesh. The only thing I can think of is "bet draws and made hands the same and run g00t." 
|
|
#13
07-13-2007, 04:00 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: The Importance of Position: Hold\'em vs. PLO
[ QUOTE ]
I haven't read this article but if you're suggesting there's a universal unexplotable strategy that works for all those depths, yeeesh. [/ QUOTE ] No, I'm saying that I don't think that there is an unexploitable strategy across all situations. (For short stacked situations yes) I was simply responding to your comment implying that you thought that there was.
|
|
#14
07-13-2007, 04:14 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: The Importance of Position: Hold\'em vs. PLO
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I haven't read this article but if you're suggesting there's a universal unexplotable strategy that works for all those depths, yeeesh. [/ QUOTE ] No, I'm saying that I don't think that there is an unexploitable strategy across all situations. (For short stacked situations yes) I was simply responding to your comment implying that you thought that there was. [/ QUOTE ] It is universal if you only occupy the universe in which you can get it all in on the flop. I never said anywhere in my comment that it was unexploitable across all scenarios.
|
|
#15
07-13-2007, 04:17 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: The Importance of Position: Hold\'em vs. PLO
[ QUOTE ]
It is universal if you only occupy the universe in which you can get it all in on the flop. I never said anywhere in my comment that it was unexploitable across all scenarios. [/ QUOTE ] Excellent*. We agree. *Excellent for you that is. If we didn't agree, then I would prove you wrong and you'd be so embarrassed you probably wouldn't post on 2+2 for a day and a half.
|
|
#17
07-14-2007, 05:55 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: The Importance of Position: Hold\'em vs. PLO
while position in plo is generally "more important" than in nlh, being "in position" doesn't necessarily have more value. there are many situations in plo where i would rather be out of position than in.
|
|
#18
07-14-2007, 06:23 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: The Importance of Position: Hold\'em vs. PLO
Really, such as?
|
|
#19
07-14-2007, 07:48 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: The Importance of Position: Hold\'em vs. PLO
[ QUOTE ]
Really, such as? [/ QUOTE ] People that bet 100% of the time when checked to. And then in between them and you, players that are Will Call Stations.
|
|
#20
07-14-2007, 12:17 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: The Importance of Position: Hold\'em vs. PLO
[ QUOTE ]
while position in plo is generally "more important" than in nlh, being "in position" doesn't necessarily have more value. there are many situations in plo where i would rather be out of position than in. [/ QUOTE ] Correct, but Please, don’t reveal too much.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
