Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Medium Stakes Limit
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 07-23-2007, 01:36 PM
Captain R Captain R is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Lootin\' and plunderin\' the bay
Posts: 451
Default Re: 3-bet bottom set on the river?

Results:

<font color="white">I 3-bet, she paused for a second and I didn't like it. Then she 4-bet me and I insta-called. Didn't consider folding at the time, but probably should have at least thought for a second. She rolled the old QTo.</font>
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 07-23-2007, 02:26 PM
illguitar illguitar is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Ron Burgundy\'s Moustache
Posts: 285
Default Re: 3-bet bottom set on the river?

[ QUOTE ]
3 town. I can't come up with a reason not to.

[/ QUOTE ]

QFT

I just saw the results and I still can't. Her range is way too wide here to not 3 bet.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 07-23-2007, 02:29 PM
DanS DanS is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 991
Default Re: 3-bet bottom set on the river?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
3 town. I can't come up with a reason not to.

[/ QUOTE ]

QFT

I just saw the results and I still can't. Her range is way too wide here to not 3 bet.

[/ QUOTE ]

Agreed. Her hyperaggressive, lagtarded flop and turn play just earned her 3 or 4 bets on the river. Good for her.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 07-23-2007, 05:00 PM
Dagger78 Dagger78 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,037
Default Re: 3-bet bottom set on the river?

Given the read, this is 3-town.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 07-23-2007, 05:05 PM
Dagger78 Dagger78 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,037
Default Re: 3-bet bottom set on the river?

I read the results, I can't fold to a 4 bet. But now I think you're in trouble

I still can't see KK or JJ not 3 betting the turn, seems like AA to me. Was there a possible FD on the flop and she could have QTs?
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 07-23-2007, 05:06 PM
PokerBob PokerBob is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: moneyhater
Posts: 17,046
Default Re: 3-bet bottom set on the river?

3bone and then pay her ass off if she 4balls.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 07-23-2007, 05:07 PM
PokerBob PokerBob is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: moneyhater
Posts: 17,046
Default Re: 3-bet bottom set on the river?

[ QUOTE ]
Results:

<font color="white">I 3-bet, she paused for a second and I didn't like it. Then she 4-bet me and I insta-called. Didn't consider folding at the time, but probably should have at least thought for a second. She rolled the old QTo.</font>

[/ QUOTE ]

time to change your read. she's retarded.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 07-23-2007, 07:31 PM
MitchL MitchL is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: St. Paul, MN
Posts: 1,712
Default Re: 3-bet bottom set on the river?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Results:

<font color="white">I 3-bet, she paused for a second and I didn't like it. Then she 4-bet me and I insta-called. Didn't consider folding at the time, but probably should have at least thought for a second. She rolled the old QTo.</font>

[/ QUOTE ]

time to change your read. she's retarded.

[/ QUOTE ]

Flop 3-bet was expert. Also, doesnt the aggressive-looking flop 3bet always mean overs?
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 07-23-2007, 07:41 PM
Captain R Captain R is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Lootin\' and plunderin\' the bay
Posts: 451
Default Re: 3-bet bottom set on the river?

[ QUOTE ]

Flop 3-bet was expert. Also, doesnt the aggressive-looking flop 3bet always mean overs?

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't have a problem with her 3-betting, hell I've done that before... [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] I put her on 1 or 2 overs with the insta-aggressive 3-bet. It was pretty clear to me that the way to maximize my hand was to just call the 3 and c/r the turn. Especially when the K hit, that's enough of an overcard for her to bet.

On the river I debated, because I thought she could legitimately have AA here and QT lurked around in the dark corner of my mind, but I figured some Ax two pair was a more likely hand (it looks like I have KJ/K4/etc.).

But as someone pointed out, I really can't fold to a 4-bet, so am I 2/3 sure I have her beat?

No, no flush draw on flop. Are you kidding? I would 4-town any flop flush draw.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 07-23-2007, 07:48 PM
MitchL MitchL is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: St. Paul, MN
Posts: 1,712
Default Re: 3-bet bottom set on the river?

Her flop 3 is pretty horrible imo, and she compounds it by not taking a free card on the turn. It would be different if she were up against a passive player, but assuming you are aggressive she spewed on all streets except the river when she got extremely lucky.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:23 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.