#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 3-bet bottom set on the river?
Results:
<font color="white">I 3-bet, she paused for a second and I didn't like it. Then she 4-bet me and I insta-called. Didn't consider folding at the time, but probably should have at least thought for a second. She rolled the old QTo.</font> |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 3-bet bottom set on the river?
[ QUOTE ]
3 town. I can't come up with a reason not to. [/ QUOTE ] QFT I just saw the results and I still can't. Her range is way too wide here to not 3 bet. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 3-bet bottom set on the river?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] 3 town. I can't come up with a reason not to. [/ QUOTE ] QFT I just saw the results and I still can't. Her range is way too wide here to not 3 bet. [/ QUOTE ] Agreed. Her hyperaggressive, lagtarded flop and turn play just earned her 3 or 4 bets on the river. Good for her. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 3-bet bottom set on the river?
Given the read, this is 3-town.
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 3-bet bottom set on the river?
I read the results, I can't fold to a 4 bet. But now I think you're in trouble
I still can't see KK or JJ not 3 betting the turn, seems like AA to me. Was there a possible FD on the flop and she could have QTs? |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 3-bet bottom set on the river?
3bone and then pay her ass off if she 4balls.
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 3-bet bottom set on the river?
[ QUOTE ]
Results: <font color="white">I 3-bet, she paused for a second and I didn't like it. Then she 4-bet me and I insta-called. Didn't consider folding at the time, but probably should have at least thought for a second. She rolled the old QTo.</font> [/ QUOTE ] time to change your read. she's retarded. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 3-bet bottom set on the river?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Results: <font color="white">I 3-bet, she paused for a second and I didn't like it. Then she 4-bet me and I insta-called. Didn't consider folding at the time, but probably should have at least thought for a second. She rolled the old QTo.</font> [/ QUOTE ] time to change your read. she's retarded. [/ QUOTE ] Flop 3-bet was expert. Also, doesnt the aggressive-looking flop 3bet always mean overs? |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 3-bet bottom set on the river?
[ QUOTE ]
Flop 3-bet was expert. Also, doesnt the aggressive-looking flop 3bet always mean overs? [/ QUOTE ] I don't have a problem with her 3-betting, hell I've done that before... [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] I put her on 1 or 2 overs with the insta-aggressive 3-bet. It was pretty clear to me that the way to maximize my hand was to just call the 3 and c/r the turn. Especially when the K hit, that's enough of an overcard for her to bet. On the river I debated, because I thought she could legitimately have AA here and QT lurked around in the dark corner of my mind, but I figured some Ax two pair was a more likely hand (it looks like I have KJ/K4/etc.). But as someone pointed out, I really can't fold to a 4-bet, so am I 2/3 sure I have her beat? No, no flush draw on flop. Are you kidding? I would 4-town any flop flush draw. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 3-bet bottom set on the river?
Her flop 3 is pretty horrible imo, and she compounds it by not taking a free card on the turn. It would be different if she were up against a passive player, but assuming you are aggressive she spewed on all streets except the river when she got extremely lucky.
|
|
|