|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Would you use (visit, read, and/or post in) a Fantasy Football sub-forum on 2+2? | |||
| YES, a Fantasy Sports sub-forum is a great idea |
   
|
17 | 45.95% |
| MAYBE, I'm not sure |
  
|
9 | 24.32% |
| NO, a Fantasy Sports sub-forum is a bad idea |
  
|
11 | 29.73% |
| I don't care, just show me the results |
  
|
0 | 0% |
| Voters: 37. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
07-18-2007, 08:47 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: How do you get these massive (up)swingy graphs?
[ QUOTE ]
Post your boring 100k hand graph. [/ QUOTE ] They are spread over 3 different computers so you will need some interpolation skills. Will try to get them up pretty soon though. 
|
|
#15
07-18-2007, 09:50 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: How do you get these massive (up)swingy graphs?
Your PFR is too high lagtard
 
|
|
#17
07-18-2007, 10:16 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: How do you get these massive (up)swingy graphs?
I don't get the whole "play 23/20" arguments, you can play 10/10 or 38/30 and be profitable if your postflop game is good.
|
|
#19
07-18-2007, 10:22 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: How do you get these massive (up)swingy graphs?
Stake,
Playing 23/20 instead of 10/10 will mean more variance (actually maybe not since your winrate as a 10/10 will suck etc bla bla let's ignore that part for now). It will also mean a higher winrate. More variance + higher winrate = more boomswitches, which is what OP asked for.
|
|
#20
07-18-2007, 10:30 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: How do you get these massive (up)swingy graphs?
OK, makes sense.
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
