#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Double checking because I got flamed for the next hour...
shoving here is also bad at a full table. only marginally bad, but bad.
if you are going to play the hand at all this is how to play it. I wouldn't though. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Double checking because I got flamed for the next hour...
[ QUOTE ]
shoving here is also bad at a full table. only marginally bad, but bad. if you are going to play the hand at all this is how to play it. I wouldn't though. [/ QUOTE ] To clarify your saying standard raising is a better way to play it than pushing? It'd be cool if you'd explain that since I definitely disagree if that is indeed what you are saying. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Double checking because I got flamed for the next hour...
HE saying push/fold with ltos more words
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Double checking because I got flamed for the next hour...
[ QUOTE ]
HE saying push/fold with ltos more words [/ QUOTE ] Oh ok, I wasnt sure he was referring to when he said "this", thought he meant the op. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Double checking because I got flamed for the next hour...
[ QUOTE ]
meh. push/fold preflop. [/ QUOTE ] Edit: Like how you played it though, OP, wondering how much of the bigstack tilty factor widened your assessment of his range enough to induce this shove. That I'd notice. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Double checking because I got flamed for the next hour...
The tilt factor made the decision much easier. Villain had 800k when I got to the table a few orbits before. He had lost the AK < AJ hand and had raised 3 times already this orbit. He got called by short stack on one of the raises and showed down a small PP. I also had seen him re-raise from the blinds and take down pots. I figured I was a flip to a small PP and 60/40 to Ax. Not to be results oriented, but he had A2o. I flopped a Queen and took down the hand putting me about 14th in chips.
I think that I got the math right on the 2.75:1. The hand history said that I called 185,230 to win 508,460. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Double checking because I got flamed for the next hour...
[ QUOTE ]
I think that I got the math right on the 2.75:1. The hand history said that I called 185,230 to win 508,460. [/ QUOTE ] You're counting your call in with what you're going to win, thats where the error is. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Double checking because I got flamed for the next hour...
yep.. you're right.
Also, I agree with everyone saying this is a push/fold hand. Somehow, I didn't really realize that I was so low. This just turns into one of those hands that we have problems with between 12-15BB. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Double checking because I got flamed for the next hour...
equity (%) win (%) tie (%) Hand 1: 33.2029 % 32.85% 00.35% { KQo } Hand 2: 66.7971 % 66.44% 00.35% { 88+, ATs+, AJo+ } 1.75:1 is more accurate, I think, but it's still enough against the above range. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Double checking because I got flamed for the next hour...
[ QUOTE ]
HE saying push/fold with ltos more words [/ QUOTE ] actually I'm not. raise/calling is much better than pushing. but folding is best anyway so here it doesn't much matter. |
|
|