#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: FT200 No pair against a maniac
yeah, it is ok.
he doesn't have a hand here very often. not sure how much FE you have if he does have a piece |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: FT200 No pair against a maniac
[ QUOTE ]
Word of advice: It's generally a good idea to make a hand vs a 68/41 and then bet said hand. A hand would be a pair or greater. [/ QUOTE ] against a 68/41 A hi is a pretty good hand imo |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: FT200 No pair against a maniac
[ QUOTE ]
Word of advice: It's generally a good idea to make a hand vs a 68/41 and then bet said hand. A hand would be a pair or greater. [/ QUOTE ] Yeah, fit or fold ldo. This is a crappy post but I guess it might be sarcastic. Range, equity, folding equity etc. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: FT200 No pair against a maniac
Imo you have zero fold equity here. I like to get it all in this spot if i have a better erad on how he plays postflop./ Some 60/40 are uber donks riasing /betting with air, some are pretty decent postflop and having a pair sv them would be much better
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: FT200 No pair against a maniac
the amount of times i lose to a mid pair if i shoved here would infuriate me
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: FT200 No pair against a maniac
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Word of advice: It's generally a good idea to make a hand vs a 68/41 and then bet said hand. A hand would be a pair or greater. [/ QUOTE ] Yeah, fit or fold ldo. This is a crappy post but I guess it might be sarcastic. Range, equity, folding equity etc. [/ QUOTE ] Does anyone know how wide his range would have to be to make pushing profitable? |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: FT200 No pair against a maniac
[ QUOTE ]
Imo you have zero fold equity here. I like to get it all in this spot if i have a better erad on how he plays postflop./ Some 60/40 are uber donks riasing /betting with air, some are pretty decent postflop and having a pair sv them would be much better [/ QUOTE ] the point is he hardly ever has anything |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: FT200 No pair against a maniac
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Word of advice: It's generally a good idea to make a hand vs a 68/41 and then bet said hand. A hand would be a pair or greater. [/ QUOTE ] Yeah, fit or fold ldo. This is a crappy post but I guess it might be sarcastic. Range, equity, folding equity etc. [/ QUOTE ] Does anyone know how wide his range would have to be to make pushing profitable? [/ QUOTE ] It has to be a pure bluff somthing like 30% of the time. That's assuming he'll never call with worse except FDs and he calls all PPs. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Re: FT200 No pair against a maniac
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Imo you have zero fold equity here. I like to get it all in this spot if i have a better erad on how he plays postflop./ Some 60/40 are uber donks riasing /betting with air, some are pretty decent postflop and having a pair sv them would be much better [/ QUOTE ] the point is he hardly ever has anything [/ QUOTE ] well imo that depends on how he plays postflop... |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Re: FT200 No pair against a maniac
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Word of advice: It's generally a good idea to make a hand vs a 68/41 and then bet said hand. A hand would be a pair or greater. [/ QUOTE ] Yeah, fit or fold ldo. This is a crappy post but I guess it might be sarcastic. Range, equity, folding equity etc. [/ QUOTE ] Does anyone know how wide his range would have to be to make pushing profitable? [/ QUOTE ] It has to be a pure bluff somthing like 30% of the time. That's assuming he'll never call with worse except FDs and he calls all PPs. [/ QUOTE ] I think he folds 22 and 33 some % of the time, and calls Ax air some % of the time also. |
|
|