#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: overpair, check-raised, raggedy-ass flop
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] (remember this is West Coast-style kill, which is triggered by someone winning two consecutive pots.) [/ QUOTE ] That's how it works everywhere, isn't it? [/ QUOTE ] in some places (mostly East Coast), a kill is triggered by a pot above a certain size. this is also common in split-pot games. "West Coast" is not really accurate since i think the midwest does it this way too, but midwest casino poker comes from west coast casino poker anyway. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: overpair, check-raised, raggedy-ass flop
for those who want to call down: if we think we're ahead often enough to get to showdown, isn't it worth it to invest 1 extra SB to (hopefully) do so HU rather than 4 ways? the pot is big and our hand is decent but vulnerable.
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: overpair, check-raised, raggedy-ass flop
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] (remember this is West Coast-style kill, which is triggered by someone winning two consecutive pots.) [/ QUOTE ] That's how it works everywhere, isn't it? [/ QUOTE ] in some places (Foxwoods), a kill is triggered by Babar slamming his button down on the table. this is also common in split-pot games. "West Coast" is not really accurate since i think the midwest does it this way too, but midwest casino poker comes from west coast casino poker anyway. [/ QUOTE ] Yeah, that's how we do it, which is why I was wondering. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: overpair, check-raised, raggedy-ass flop
[ QUOTE ]
for those who want to call down: if we think we're ahead often enough to get to showdown, isn't it worth it to invest 1 extra SB to (hopefully) do so HU rather than 4 ways? the pot is big and our hand is decent but vulnerable. [/ QUOTE ] so you're wanting to 3 bang the flop to try and get it HU? You may get overs to fold, but do you want a lamo to fold his 3? Or is that unheard of in this game? I guess if you can fold the turn after the c/rer caps, I like that plan. Heck, it may buy you some free cards. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: overpair, check-raised, raggedy-ass flop
How does the button act after the BB preflop?!
Flop is 3 bet, with a CD if he caps it on the flop. I have to see the 3s or the 98s here. If he did a funky limp/RR thing then i "might" find a fold but that is unlikely. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: overpair, check-raised, raggedy-ass flop
3-bet flop.
Bet/fold turn. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: overpair, check-raised, raggedy-ass flop
yes totally 3 bet flop.
your J are very weak vs the other 2 caller if they have overcards. he caps flop then if u dont hit a great cards( 8 or J),just fold turn 8= i would just call down |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: overpair, check-raised, raggedy-ass flop
WE HAVE A KILL GAME!!1!1!1!!!one
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Re: overpair, check-raised, raggedy-ass flop
i'm not sure this is the right way to look at this, but here are some stoves.
first case: i gave Villain a range of 8x, 3x, TT-99 (is this unreasonable?). i gave the limper the top 50% of hands. i gave the BB a random hand. 10,281,244 games 477.116 secs 21,548 games/sec Board: 8d 8c 3s Dead: equity win tie pots won pots tied Hand 0: 36.981% 36.92% 00.06% 3795965 6108.83 { JhJs } Hand 1: 37.239% 36.57% 00.67% 3759957 68709.17 { TT-88, 33, A8s, A3s, K8s, K3s, Q8s, Q3s, J8s, J3s, T8s, T3s, 98s, 93s, 82s+, 73s, 63s, 53s, 43s, 32s, A8o, A3o, K8o, K3o, Q8o, Q3o, J8o, J3o, T8o, T3o, 98o, 93o, 83o+, 73o, 63o, 53o, 43o, 32o } Hand 2: 14.831% 14.35% 00.48% 1475081 49767.00 { 33+, A2s+, K2s+, Q2s+, J4s+, T6s+, 96s+, 86s+, 76s, 65s, A2o+, K5o+, Q7o+, J7o+, T8o+, 98o } Hand 3: 10.949% 10.44% 00.51% 1073079 52577.00 { random } second case: if my 3bet gets it HU with Villain (who still has 8x, 3x, TT-99): equity win tie pots won pots tied Hand 0: 55.869% 55.87% 00.00% 7836046 155.50 { JhJs } Hand 1: 44.131% 44.13% 00.00% 6189758 155.50 { TT-88, 33, A8s, A3s, K8s, K3s, Q8s, Q3s, J8s, J3s, T8s, T3s, 98s, 93s, 82s+, 73s, 63s, 53s, 43s, 32s, A8o, A3o, K8o, K3o, Q8o, Q3o, J8o, J3o, T8o, T3o, 98o, 93o, 82o+, 73o, 63o, 53o, 43o, 32o } let's assume that if i 3bet, i will get HU with villain, but he will cap the flop and lead the turn and river (and i will call down). let's assume that if i just call, both players will call the flop and one will call all the way down. when i just call, the pot will contain 10 BB and i have contributed 4 BB of it. i will win 6 BB 36% of the time and lose 4 BB 64% of the time: 6*.36 - 4*.64 = -.4BB. 2-ways (when i 3bet and get it HU and villain caps) the pot will contain 12 BB and i will have contributed 5 BB of it. i will win 7 BB 55% of the time and lose 5 BB 45% of the time: 7*.55 - 5*.45 = 1.6BB. that's a significant difference. it becomes less as we skew Villain's hand range to contain more 8s (since that is his probably his most likely holding given the flop action), but i still think 3betting and hoping to get HU is the most profitable play. is my methodology whack? |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Re: overpair, check-raised, raggedy-ass flop
[ QUOTE ]
Folding is bad, don't people limp TT/99 in live games? [/ QUOTE ] Passives do, but then they don't necessarily c/r paired boards (they're far more likely to donk this flop). |
|
|