Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Poker Discussion > Brick and Mortar
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-26-2007, 11:41 AM
Phat Mack Phat Mack is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: People\'s Republic of Texas
Posts: 2,663
Default Re: Ruling needed, I feel dirty (Winstar obv)

AJs used to have a rule that would have awarded the pot to the guy who folded. It should probably be more widely adopted.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-26-2007, 01:05 PM
bav bav is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Vegas
Posts: 2,857
Default Re: Ruling needed, I feel dirty (Winstar obv)

[ QUOTE ]
AJs used to have a rule that would have awarded the pot to the guy who folded. It should probably be more widely adopted.

[/ QUOTE ]
I disagree. If a player wants a piece at showdown, all that is required is to table the hand. Really easy, and at that point you get the full help of the dealer and the players at the table to correctly read the hand. But instead, if you opt to read your own hands and keep them s3kr3t unless you have a winner, then you pay the price for failing to read your hand correctly. And failing to see a straight on the board is failing to read your hand correctly.

On the other hand, if the player says "I'm playing the board" and then mucks, ok, I can take pity on him for having read Robert's Rules and believing they apply everywhere. He HAS read his hand, and he knows what he's playing and that his two cards are immaterial. In that case it's a matter of not knowing a specific casino's policy on that specific topic, and that's a lame way to lose a pot.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-26-2007, 04:30 PM
RR RR is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: on-line
Posts: 5,113
Default Re: Ruling needed, I feel dirty (Winstar obv)

[ QUOTE ]
On the other hand, if the player says "I'm playing the board" and then mucks, ok, I can take pity on him for having read Robert's Rules and believing they apply everywhere. He HAS read his hand, and he knows what he's playing and that his two cards are immaterial. In that case it's a matter of not knowing a specific casino's policy on that specific topic, and that's a lame way to lose a pot.


[/ QUOTE ]

That rule is actually in every good set of rules I have ever seen. A lot of people read too much into it. All it means if if you are playing the board, make it clear you are playing the board, and throw your hand away because you don't know you have to show you still get your money. What it does not allow is for an experienced player to say "play the board" and muck his cards to keep from showing them.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:09 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.