|
|
|
|
#1
10-29-2007, 09:42 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: High Stakes Poker thread (10/29 - spoilers possible)
[ QUOTE ]
Nah, he's not a Nit...... [/ QUOTE ] wow, he mucks a pair?? that is classic. Yeah, lets see people defend his live play now. 
|
|
#3
10-29-2007, 09:06 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: High Stakes Poker thread (10/29 - spoilers possible)
Not gonna berate him. He didn't think it was good and probably didn't want anyone to know he was raising with T[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]7[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img].
|
|
#4
10-29-2007, 09:08 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: High Stakes Poker thread (10/29 - spoilers possible)
why does gold do that before a fold?
why can't he just fold?
|
|
#5
10-29-2007, 10:47 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: High Stakes Poker thread (10/29 - spoilers possible)
[ QUOTE ]
Not gonna berate him. He didn't think it was good and probably didn't want anyone to know he was raising with T7. [/ QUOTE ] Ummm...how about keep your cards in your hand until somebody tables something that beats you?
|
|
#6
10-30-2007, 01:52 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: High Stakes Poker thread (10/29 - spoilers possible)
[ QUOTE ]
Not gonna berate him. He didn't think it was good and probably didn't want anyone to know he was raising with T[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]7[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]. [/ QUOTE ] Yeah, I'm sure that was his plan, make them think he was raising with Q6 instead.
|
|
#8
10-29-2007, 10:54 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: High Stakes Poker thread (10/29 - spoilers possible)
Kaplan made a good point tonight. Jamie Gold, for someone who aspires to be the world's greatest bluffer, doesn't value bet nearly enough. I don't recall seeing anybody check down as many winners on this show as him. Sometimes he does it so quickly it seems like he's not even considering a bet.
For someone who is notorious bluffer, it seems +EV to bet when you have it, too. That's just me.
|
|
#9
10-29-2007, 11:05 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: High Stakes Poker thread (10/29 - spoilers possible)
[ QUOTE ]
Kaplan made a good point tonight. Jamie Gold, for someone who aspires to be the world's greatest bluffer, doesn't value bet nearly enough. I don't recall seeing anybody check down as many winners on this show as him. Sometimes he does it so quickly it seems like he's not even considering a bet. For someone who is notorious bluffer, it seems +EV to bet when you have it, too. That's just me. [/ QUOTE ] Not only that, but it also seems like courting disaster when he bluffs big next time. I'm sure that most players picked up on his betting patterns.
|
|
#10
10-30-2007, 12:03 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: High Stakes Poker thread (10/29 - spoilers possible)
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Kaplan made a good point tonight. Jamie Gold, for someone who aspires to be the world's greatest bluffer, doesn't value bet nearly enough. I don't recall seeing anybody check down as many winners on this show as him. Sometimes he does it so quickly it seems like he's not even considering a bet. For someone who is notorious bluffer, it seems +EV to bet when you have it, too. That's just me. [/ QUOTE ] Not only that, but it also seems like courting disaster when he bluffs big next time. I'm sure that most players picked up on his betting patterns. [/ QUOTE ]Hey Gabe, Don't tap the glass! [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
