Pretty simple calling range hand vs gank

[billyjex]

Given how you have been active and it's a button vs BB situation, I think you have to call 99+, AQ+. Even if Gank is generally nitty (it's been awhile since I've played with him) I think he can make some moves here.

[mlagoo]

[ QUOTE ]
Given how you have been active and it's a button vs BB situation, I think you have to call 99+, AQ+. Even if Gank is generally nitty (it's been awhile since I've played with him) I think he can make some moves here.

[/ QUOTE ]

this was gonna be my exact range as well. i just wasnt sure whether it should loosen up to AJ/88... i think those two are the really tough hands.

[bigballz]

I would think AJ and AQ suck here considering how often this is AK.

[mlagoo]

[ QUOTE ]
I would think AJ and AQ suck here considering how often this is AK.

[/ QUOTE ]

i really dont think his range is more heavily weighted to AK than any other hand in his range. its just a button v blind situation with two players who know the other player is playing aggressively, his range ought to be pretty wide (although not ridiculously wide) here.

[aejones]

any two that you 3-bet with

[bigballz]

[ QUOTE ]
any two that you 3-bet with

[/ QUOTE ]
k no

[NoahSD]

[ QUOTE ]
any two that you 3-bet with

[/ QUOTE ]

Aren't you the guy who likes to try to play all unexploitably and stuff? Do you think it's unexploitable to call with anything you 3-bet with here?

[ QUOTE ]
any two that you 3-bet with

[/ QUOTE ]

You forgot to mention how not even close it was. Yutz. [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]

88+ AQ+ sounds about right to me.

[aejones]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
any two that you 3-bet with

[/ QUOTE ]

Aren't you the guy who likes to try to play all unexploitably and stuff? Do you think it's unexploitable to call with anything you 3-bet with here?

[/ QUOTE ]

bad stage to 3-bet light with homes