|
|
|
|
#1
04-17-2006, 03:38 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $114 hand vs. Ryanghall
I'm confused. Doesn't ryan reraise any monster here? Except maybe AA, but a lot of people don't even do that. I say you can call and bet a safe flop, or push. I guess I lean towards #1, just in case someone behind me wakes up.
|
|
#2
04-17-2006, 03:41 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: $114 hand vs. Ryanghall
[ QUOTE ]
I'm confused. Doesn't ryan reraise any monster here? Except maybe AA, but a lot of people don't even do that. I say you can call and bet a safe flop, or push. I guess I lean towards #1, just in case someone behind me wakes up. [/ QUOTE ] Why would ryan re-raise QQ-AA here? That's terrible poker playing. Actually, he shouldn't re-raise any hand that he calls with here. I think that ryan is calling this with TT+/AKo+ considering there are 6 other people behind him, I would think he folds 99 and lower/AQ-. Folding jacks here would probably be the correct play.
|
|
#3
04-17-2006, 03:47 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: $114 hand vs. Ryanghall
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I'm confused. Doesn't ryan reraise any monster here? Except maybe AA, but a lot of people don't even do that. I say you can call and bet a safe flop, or push. I guess I lean towards #1, just in case someone behind me wakes up. [/ QUOTE ] Why would ryan re-raise QQ-AA here? That's terrible poker playing. Actually, he shouldn't re-raise any hand that he calls with here. I think that ryan is calling this with TT+/AKo+ considering there are 6 other people behind him, I would think he folds 99 and lower/AQ-. Folding jacks here would probably be the correct play. [/ QUOTE ] What? You really want 2+ more callers to your QQ? I don't even like to see that with AA. I feel like I won the lottery if my AA holds up 3-way. UTG+1's range is something like 15-20% here I would think. Did he just lose his chips on the previous hand? If so then he could be a lot wider than that. This widens ryans range a TON, and widens the range of those acting behind him. To me, his call here means he has a good hand, that he wants to see if he can get UTG's chips, but is a little scared of someone waking up behind him. Flat-calling with QQ would be horrible IMO.
|
|
#4
04-17-2006, 03:49 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: $114 hand vs. Ryanghall
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] I'm confused. Doesn't ryan reraise any monster here? Except maybe AA, but a lot of people don't even do that. I say you can call and bet a safe flop, or push. I guess I lean towards #1, just in case someone behind me wakes up. [/ QUOTE ] Why would ryan re-raise QQ-AA here? That's terrible poker playing. Actually, he shouldn't re-raise any hand that he calls with here. I think that ryan is calling this with TT+/AKo+ considering there are 6 other people behind him, I would think he folds 99 and lower/AQ-. Folding jacks here would probably be the correct play. [/ QUOTE ] What? You really want 2 more callers to your QQ? UTG+1's range is something like 15-20% here I would think. Did he just lose his chips on the previous hand? If so then he could be a lot wider than that. This widens ryans range a TON, and widens the range of those acting behind him. To me, his call here means he has a good hand, that he wants to see if he can get UTG's chips, but is a little scared of someone waking up behind him. Flat-calling with QQ would be horrible IMO. [/ QUOTE ] You're terrible. I'm not even going to discuss why you're wrong.
|
|
#7
04-17-2006, 04:00 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: $114 hand vs. Ryanghall
I had QQ.
I should have perhaps reraised preflop, but it's close. Once eagles pushed, I put him on KK/AA so I folded. I'm quite surprised he pushed JJ, as I think it's an easy fold. Ryan
|
|
#10
04-17-2006, 04:10 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: $114 hand vs. Ryanghall
[ QUOTE ]
Hold that point. I think it's pretty hard to assume that anyone is folding QQ here so it really doesn't matter. Ryan [/ QUOTE ] Obv. But you do see what I'm getting at also, hence why folding JJ here is the best move.
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
