#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: perky back?
lol fair enough, was he a big loser? this TimeServed is definitly a big long term loser
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: perky back?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] any idea what name he used to play under? [/ QUOTE ] The guy I am thinking of started out playing as jacksjr, then switched to timeserved to get rakeback. He gave a ton of action and liked to play HU. [/ QUOTE ] I remember Jacks as well and yes he was also timeserved. Played both big NL and limit on pokerroom. It seems very likely they are the same person as he was indeed capable of creating huge pots HU and the names are identical capitilizations included |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: perky back?
[ QUOTE ]
lol fair enough, was he a big loser? this TimeServed is definitly a big long term loser [/ QUOTE ] I believe he used to be a winner, but back then, everyone on the site sucked at NL. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: perky back?
[ QUOTE ]
lol fair enough, was he a big loser? this TimeServed is definitly a big long term loser [/ QUOTE ] pretty sure jacks was a loser even pre UIGEA on pokerroom. granted he played the biggest games somewhat consistently, so he wasnt truly horrible by any standard, but was a loser nontheless |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: perky back?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] lol fair enough, was he a big loser? this TimeServed is definitly a big long term loser [/ QUOTE ] I believe he used to be a winner, but back then, everyone on the site sucked at NL. [/ QUOTE ] this could very well be true. i didnt play a lot of NL then, I do however know he lost at the big limit games. I also recall him busting large rolls at least a few times once games starting gettin tougher/he was tilted but this doesnt necessarily mean he was a loser |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: perky back?
jacksjr used to play on pokerstars too 100-200 limit.
|
|
|