![]() |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Keep comunicatin with them and find out exactly what they mean by "fraudulant" activity.... This seems odd with what you have explained so far.
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
If they are loosing money due to payment processors' fees I do not mind they charge me for it. Maybe 2% of 5% of my deposits. But not 50% or 100%. [/ QUOTE ] They are in the business of collecting rakes from people playing poker. If you are depositing for reasons other than playing poker don't expect them to be happy with you. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
They are in the business of collecting rakes from people playing poker. If you are depositing for reasons other than playing poker don't expect them to be happy with you. [/ QUOTE ] As I said I was going to play. I did not cashout the full amount, my friend did not cash out at all. Yes, I may have deposited more than I needed and took some back. Is that a crime? If yes, how about denying my cashout until I play X number of raked hands instead of doing what they did? |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
When will people learn that poker sites are not banks where you can deposit money for a few days, write checks to friends, then withdraw what's left at your convenience?
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
My friend also had his account closed and money confiscated. Interestingly, he got the same reasoning from them "is linked to other accounts that were involved in suspicious and/or fraudulent activity". I did not transfer money to anyone else, neither did he. We know each other personally and live nearby. He never cashed out from AP. He also did not get a chance to play much. We never sat at the same table. I can't think of what we violated. At least, the reasoning they gave us is bogus: accounts locked for being linked to one another. [/ QUOTE ] I've seen this thread a hundred times. Most are first time posters. OP is guilty until proven o/wise. Heavily odds-on. About 95% of them end up with a convicted OP who gave incomplete or altered info to us looking for sympathy or outs. You maybe thought this was Absolute S+L? Absolute doesn't take action on a whim. So what was it? Really? Collusion, multiple accounts, chip-dumping, the 'friend' who cheats with others using money you sent him, credit card fraud...what have I missed? Skeptical me...Rainbow... |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
When will people learn that poker sites are not banks where you can deposit money for a few days, write checks to friends, then withdraw what's left at your convenience? [/ QUOTE ] If it's not cheating or fraud then that is more than likely the reason why. They dont like being manipulated. Try calling them. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
So former neteller user. Spreads money around a bunch of poker sites. Drops a couple grand on Absolute. Transfers money to friend who also uses neteller. Opens click-to-pay account.
Yet, this is the first time he has posted on 2+2. I don't know why, but something just seems to make me think we aren't getting the whole story here. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
the fees are not the only reason sites dont want to be used as money transfer services. alot of other legal reasons.
i dont think they should take your funds though without another reason. people do need to be careful though about transfering funds to pokersites and not actually playing any poker. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
When will people learn that poker sites are not banks where you can deposit money for a few days, write checks to friends, then withdraw what's left at your convenience? [/ QUOTE ] Nothing in OP's story even remotely justifies locking the account. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
When will people learn that poker sites are not banks where you can deposit money for a few days, write checks to friends, then withdraw what's left at your convenience? [/ QUOTE ] Repeat. I did not withdraw what was left. And my friend did not withdraw anything at all. Maybe I deposited a bit more than I really need it. But does it constitute a ground for confiscating the money. |
![]() |
|
|