Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 12-01-2006, 06:16 PM
wpr101 wpr101 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 6,821
Default Re: 66 is an overpair, multiway pot

I probably check that flop and may call a decent size bet.

I don't have a real strong opinion about the turn. On one hand he is almost always going to bet when checked to, sometimes with the flush draw. But it is also hard to proceed on the river when he bets like he did.

What was the main part of ur argument about?
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12-01-2006, 06:29 PM
acidca acidca is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Manhattan
Posts: 1,765
Default Re: 66 is an overpair, multiway pot

He thought I should have bet the turn.

My problem with check-calling this flop is that I have almost no information on my opponents, and I have no control over the action. I mean, if the action goes:

SB checks, Hero checks, CO bets $20, Button calls $20, SB folds...

Hero is going to have a VERY hard time, no?
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 12-01-2006, 06:30 PM
Law Player Law Player is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 31
Default Re: 66 is an overpair, multiway pot

I think worst advice possible seems a little exaggerated. This was my analysis. If villian raises and Hero decides to reraise. There is a good possiblity that villian was merely continuation betting and folds. However, If villian does not fold or reraises to hero's raise, I am giving up on this pot. However in most instances, I am checking the flop and folding to a raise, and was calling solely for set value. I agree that there is absolutely no card I want to see on the turn if I reraise. I would be reraising solely to stop a continuation bet given that my opponent c-bets 90% of the time and I do have top pair. I really don't think that this advice is that terrible. However, I will be interested for a response.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 12-01-2006, 06:32 PM
Law Player Law Player is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 31
Default Re: 66 is an overpair, multiway pot

Basically, I am very seldomly reraising. I am rerasing solely because I have a read on my opponent that he c-bets constantly and will fold air. Almost all of the time I am giving up on this pot to raises and given that so many people entered the hand.

I am probably not calling a raise on the flop because as someone stated above, it becomes to difficult to continue calling because absolutely every card hurts you and I don't like making calls solely to fold on the river.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 12-01-2006, 06:37 PM
acidca acidca is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Manhattan
Posts: 1,765
Default Re: 66 is an overpair, multiway pot

[ QUOTE ]
Basically, I am very seldomly reraising. I am rerasing solely because I have a read on my opponent that he c-bets constantly and will fold air. Almost all of the time I am giving up on this pot to raises and given that so many people entered the hand.

[/ QUOTE ]

Two problems with this line of thought:
1. Reraising bloats the pot with a vulnerable, marginal holding, and you will never be called by a hand you have beat. We allow villain to play perfectly against us.
2. The hands villain is likely to continuation-bet look rather strong on this board, such as AK. He may consider A, K, and 3 to be outs.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 12-01-2006, 06:39 PM
Requies Requies is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 64
Default Re: 66 is an overpair, multiway pot

[ QUOTE ]
I agree that there is absolutely no card I want to see on the turn if I reraise.

[/ QUOTE ]

Actually, any non-club 3 looks good.

Dunno about the actual hand. I've bet into and CR when I have top pair.

When you check on the turn and call, though, that makes me salivate if I were the raiser. Ditto, with the check on the river when the flush hits (most flushes would be donking on the river in that case, and you've shown the ability to donk before).

Req
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 12-01-2006, 06:41 PM
Dan Bitel Dan Bitel is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bork! Bork! Bork!
Posts: 11,164
Default Re: 66 is an overpair, multiway pot

I don't ike your flop lead.

I would c/c or more likely c/f
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 12-01-2006, 06:47 PM
Law Player Law Player is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 31
Default Re: 66 is an overpair, multiway pot


Two problems with this line of thought:
1. Reraising bloats the pot with a vulnerable, marginal holding, and you will never be called by a hand you have beat. We allow villain to play perfectly against us.
2. The hands villain is likely to continuation-bet look rather strong on this board, such as AK. He may consider A, K, and 3 to be outs.

[/ QUOTE ]

I think I am being misunderstood. If I am reraising which I would only do given that I think my opponent will fold to a sizeable reraise when he gets no piece of the flop, I am doing so solely to make my opponent fold a continuation bet where he hit air. I realize if he calls I beat nothing and am not putting 1 more dollar into the pot.

Therefore, I am not betting for value, I am betting to take down the pot. Given that I don't accomplish this goal I am done putting money into the pot unless I hit a set on the turn or something. I think there is a good chance you take down this pot to a reraise, it becomes difficult for villian to call with air. If he calls, you were probably beat by raising in to him and you are not stuck wondering whether you should call the turn or river. You can decide how much money you want to stick into the pot on the flop and if this move doesn't work you are done. Villian does not get one more dollar.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 12-01-2006, 06:52 PM
Dan Bitel Dan Bitel is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bork! Bork! Bork!
Posts: 11,164
Default Re: 66 is an overpair, multiway pot

Law Player,

so to summerise, are you raising for information? Or maybe to see where you stand?
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 12-01-2006, 06:53 PM
ASmith84 ASmith84 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: In search of 100NL coach
Posts: 798
Default Re: 66 is an overpair, multiway pot

I like the c/r on the flop, you have no idea where you stand as played.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:39 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.