|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Weird preflop checkup
im not exactly sure of the game dynamics, but i would imagine that im probably cc'ing with any pair lower then TT maybe JJ in this spot. the two blinds will more then likely come along and probably one or two other randoms, and its a pretty easy hand to get away from.
but i think just calling with 88 is probably the best. the way you run itll come down A88 with 2 hearts, someone will have KThh someone will have AA someone will have AQo and you will win like a 3k pot. wp nh sir |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Weird preflop checkup
This seems like a pretty easy coldcall. I assume from your post you are next to act and there have been no folds in between you and the coldcaller. I am happy to get a big pot going and with the desciption of the initial raiser you are basically always going to be a slight favorite or a big dog. The small bet can be reinvested on the flop when you flop well and saved when the flop is crap for your hand.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Weird preflop checkup
this seems like a pretty easy coldcall to me
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Weird preflop checkup
call if you expect callers behind you. Otherwise fold.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Weird preflop checkup
[ QUOTE ]
Even if we are behind UTG theres a good chance we can control the amount of bets he puts in if we are behind i.e. he will shut down pretty quickly when shown strength. [/ QUOTE ] I'm guessing that UTG raises 99+ as well, and this gives me more incentive to 3bet. Misread OP's post, where does it state he is mp1? I assumed we were in later position... Pretty sure coldcalling 88 for set value with 2 (in most games) in late position is a leak. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Weird preflop checkup
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Even if we are behind UTG theres a good chance we can control the amount of bets he puts in if we are behind i.e. he will shut down pretty quickly when shown strength. [/ QUOTE ] I'm guessing that UTG raises 99+ as well, and this gives me more incentive to 3bet. Misread OP's post, where does it state he is mp1? I assumed we were in later position... Pretty sure coldcalling 88 for set value with 2 (in most games) in late position is a leak. [/ QUOTE ] We are not open coldcalling. There is already one coldcaller and as OP said 2 to 3 bad players behind. Also, 1 possible hand in villains range shouldnt sway the decision here. If we dont flop a set the hand is going to be flat out hard to play. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Weird preflop checkup
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Even if we are behind UTG theres a good chance we can control the amount of bets he puts in if we are behind i.e. he will shut down pretty quickly when shown strength. [/ QUOTE ] I'm guessing that UTG raises 99+ as well, and this gives me more incentive to 3bet. Misread OP's post, where does it state he is mp1? I assumed we were in later position... Pretty sure coldcalling 88 for set value with 2 (in most games) in late position is a leak. [/ QUOTE ] We are not open coldcalling. There is already one coldcaller and as OP said 2 to 3 bad players behind. Also, 1 possible hand in villains range shouldnt sway the decision here. If we dont flop a set the hand is going to be flat out hard to play. [/ QUOTE ] That is what I am saying. Pending on position, we can't depend on players to call behind on us. Although the game OP is talking about, sounds +ev to cold call here, I believe cold calling in long run is -ev. I'd most likely dump this hand in most spots, but 3 betting to get villain who is playing with scared money off a better pair after a scary flop is good too. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Weird preflop checkup
[ QUOTE ]
That is what I am saying. Pending on position, we can't depend on players to call behind on us. Although the game OP is talking about, sounds +ev to cold call here, I believe cold calling in long run is -ev. I'd most likely dump this hand in most spots, but 3 betting to get villain who is playing with scared money off a better pair after a scary flop is good too. [/ QUOTE ] you are wrong |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Weird preflop checkup
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Even if we are behind UTG theres a good chance we can control the amount of bets he puts in if we are behind i.e. he will shut down pretty quickly when shown strength. [/ QUOTE ] I'm guessing that UTG raises 99+ as well, and this gives me more incentive to 3bet. Misread OP's post, where does it state he is mp1? I assumed we were in later position... Pretty sure coldcalling 88 for set value with 2 (in most games) in late position is a leak. [/ QUOTE ] We are not open coldcalling. There is already one coldcaller and as OP said 2 to 3 bad players behind. Also, 1 possible hand in villains range shouldnt sway the decision here. If we dont flop a set the hand is going to be flat out hard to play. [/ QUOTE ] That is what I am saying. Pending on position, we can't depend on players to call behind on us. Although the game OP is talking about, sounds +ev to cold call here, I believe cold calling in long run is -ev. I'd most likely dump this hand in most spots, but 3 betting to get villain who is playing with scared money off a better pair after a scary flop is good too. [/ QUOTE ] We can assume that we will doing the same against any thinking opposition if the right flop presents itself. No one is saying that if the table dynamic was different it is wrong to 3bet 88. I do against tightish openers all the time, but that is not the crux of this hand. The crux of this hand is whether to 3bet when we expect callers who are loose and have position on us as well as an opener who might have us in bad shape. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Weird preflop checkup
Lets think about this hand for a second.
A scared UTG raises and people are thinkng about 3 betting? The worst hand this guy will have is something AJo or KQs. Both of which our hand isn't that far ahead of. Folding is probably the best play. Just calling isn't bad either. You have to be able to get away from the hand if hit a good flop(ie, no over cards). |
|
|