Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Micro Stakes Limit
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 05-08-2007, 08:41 AM
ESKiMO-SiCKNE5S ESKiMO-SiCKNE5S is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: THREE AM
Posts: 11,405
Default Re: My struggle against my inner calling station, part 2

as in, we are getting roughly the exact correct odds to call the turn bet, after factoring in our potential outs, implied odds, chance of being ahead, etc etc.

basically im saying it matters very little if we call or fold this turn.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 05-08-2007, 08:51 AM
Poker Plan Poker Plan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Shropshire, UK
Posts: 786
Default Re: My struggle against my inner calling station, part 2

[ QUOTE ]
as in, we are getting roughly the exact correct odds to call the turn bet, after factoring in our potential outs, implied odds, chance of being ahead, etc etc.

basically im saying it matters very little if we call or fold this turn.

[/ QUOTE ]

If it's that close to 0 EV, and the number of Outs is relatively low- is it not better (swing-wise)to fold?
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 05-08-2007, 09:06 AM
ESKiMO-SiCKNE5S ESKiMO-SiCKNE5S is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: THREE AM
Posts: 11,405
Default Re: My struggle against my inner calling station, part 2

variance should be completely irrelevant in a limit game.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 05-08-2007, 09:29 AM
fretelöo fretelöo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,495
Default Re: My struggle against my inner calling station, part 2

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
as in, we are getting roughly the exact correct odds to call the turn bet, after factoring in our potential outs, implied odds, chance of being ahead, etc etc.

basically im saying it matters very little if we call or fold this turn.

[/ QUOTE ]

If it's that close to 0 EV, and the number of Outs is relatively low- is it not better (swing-wise)to fold?

[/ QUOTE ]

Meh. In that case you should always CALL because you never know if villains cat doesn't happen to choose this exact moment to bite in his big toe, making his finger jerk, resulting in an "raise" click at that lovely J[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] on the river... [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 05-08-2007, 09:54 AM
ESKiMO-SiCKNE5S ESKiMO-SiCKNE5S is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: THREE AM
Posts: 11,405
Default Re: My struggle against my inner calling station, part 2

actually i factored in the 'villains cat misclick' already
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 05-08-2007, 10:16 AM
halpgr halpgr is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Nova Scotia Canada
Posts: 396
Default Re: My struggle against my inner calling station, part 2

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
as in, we are getting roughly the exact correct odds to call the turn bet, after factoring in our potential outs, implied odds, chance of being ahead, etc etc.

basically im saying it matters very little if we call or fold this turn.

[/ QUOTE ]

If it's that close to 0 EV, and the number of Outs is relatively low- is it not better (swing-wise)to fold?

[/ QUOTE ]
If it's EV 0 then you might as well call, because calling is more enjoyable than folding. If you fold you're sure to lose the hand, but if you call you might win. If it's EV 0 then it's "free" to call so call because winning hands is more enjoyable than losing.

I'm not extending this to the fish mentality of chasing regardless of pot odds because they enjoy winning hands, just in an EV 0 situation I'd think the game is more enjoyable staying in the hand.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 05-08-2007, 11:17 AM
Buzz-cp Buzz-cp is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Getting heated & cooled...
Posts: 6,999
Default Re: My struggle against my inner calling station, part 2

[ QUOTE ]
variance should be completely irrelevant in a limit game.

[/ QUOTE ]

This is not true if it has a psychological effect on your future playing abilities. If it is 0 EV then perhaps it is better to fold. I think this is slightly +EV tho [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 05-08-2007, 04:30 PM
Poker Plan Poker Plan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Shropshire, UK
Posts: 786
Default Re: My struggle against my inner calling station, part 2

[ QUOTE ]
If it's EV 0 then you might as well call, because calling is more enjoyable than folding. If you fold you're sure to lose the hand, but if you call you might win. If it's EV 0 then it's "free" to call so call because winning hands is more enjoyable than losing.

[/ QUOTE ]

OK so if EVERY hand you play, you have 1 out on the turn to win the hand. So you are a 45:1 dog to win. The pot lays you 46:1- so you have an "edge". You're calling every time right?
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 05-08-2007, 04:46 PM
Thomas Newton Thomas Newton is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 284
Default Re: My struggle against my inner calling station, part 2

Right. But check you remembered to include in your calc any extra bets you might win if your miracle happens.

If there are enough players in to make a 45 to 1 pot after the turn your probly going to get called in a few spots.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 05-08-2007, 05:01 PM
Poker Plan Poker Plan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Shropshire, UK
Posts: 786
Default Re: My struggle against my inner calling station, part 2

[ QUOTE ]
Right. But check you remembered to include in your calc any extra bets you might win if your miracle happens.

If there are enough players in to make a 45 to 1 pot after the turn your probly going to get called in a few spots.

[/ QUOTE ]

With all respect it was a totally hyperthetical question- the pots never going to lay you 45:1. The ppoint of the question is:

What is the point of chasing a 2.2% chance of winning- just to "just about" break-even??? The long run suddenly just got a lot longer- for virtually no profit. And rememberL Only when you hit the 2.2% chance do you get the pay back for the other losses- right back to where you started!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.