2 tbles left 88 facing repop

[TroutMaskReplica]

[ QUOTE ]
Come on fellas. Someone stop multi-tabling for a minute and do the math. Run some ranges. I know someone can do it.

Sherman

[/ QUOTE ]
i did?

[Sherman]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Come on fellas. Someone stop multi-tabling for a minute and do the math. Run some ranges. I know someone can do it.

Sherman

[/ QUOTE ]
i did?

[/ QUOTE ]

Where is the pokerstove output? Did you include MP in your equation? How often does he call our shove and with what hands. That has to be included.

Sherman

[TroutMaskReplica]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Come on fellas. Someone stop multi-tabling for a minute and do the math. Run some ranges. I know someone can do it.

Sherman

[/ QUOTE ]
i did?

[/ QUOTE ]

Where is the pokerstove output? Did you include MP in your equation? How often does he call our shove and with what hands. That has to be included.

Sherman

[/ QUOTE ]

fair enough. i did stove twice and quoted the results. output pasted this time.

I did also mean to mention that I'm not hugely concerned with the big stack calling so these numbers were done under that assumption. I'm not so sure how to factor him into a stove calculation, given that even though he could flat call pre with very strong hands, much/some of the time he'll be re-raising pre.

anyway:

vs 99+, AQ+

---

Text results appended to pokerstove.txt

3,794,846 games 1.162 secs 3,265,788 games/sec

Board:
Dead:

equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 64.377% 64.17% 00.20% 2435281 7736.50 { 99+, AQs+, AQo+ }
Hand 1: 35.623% 35.42% 00.20% 1344092 7736.50 { 88 }


---

you need 1.77-1 and, assuming antes you're getting 1.8-1

OR

vs. 99+, AJs, KQs (60% overs, 40% bigger pairs)

---

Text results appended to pokerstove.txt

5,605,960 games 2.253 secs 2,488,220 games/sec

Board:
Dead:

equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 62.667% 62.46% 00.21% 3501418 11681.50 { 99+, AJs+, KQs, AQo+ }
Hand 1: 37.333% 37.12% 00.21% 2081179 11681.50 { 88 }

---

you need 1.7-1 and you're getting 1.8-1 assuming antes

[Sherman]

Am I reading this wrong? Because it looks to me like we have better than (equity) 2:1 on both. [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]