#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL50, 3betting AQ from the blinds, bad line?
you can bet or check that flop. doesn't really matter much either way.
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL50, 3betting AQ from the blinds, bad line?
nevermind
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL50, 3betting AQ from the blinds, bad line?
Check/calling every street and check/folding river with a strong read is fine.
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL50, 3betting AQ from the blinds, bad line?
[ QUOTE ]
Betting this flop while getting a call from all of his range is ofcourse profitable, however, I will be giving up any potcontrol. If I bet this flop and he calls, I will have to bet the turn and be committed to call an AI raise. [/ QUOTE ] If this really concerns you then you shouldn't be 3betting AQ preflop. Pot control goes out of the window in 3 bet pots. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL50, 3betting AQ from the blinds, bad line?
bet flop
bet turn |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL50, 3betting AQ from the blinds, bad line?
Lead the flop, you have the 2nd nuts for pete sake! A very small % of his range is raising, a large % is calling (Ax, 99-KK) and only a little is folding. No real point in checking to induce a bluff if you're not sure if you're going to call it.
If the turn bricks and is dry, then checking the turn and firing river if he checks back is probably the line I'd take. |
|
|