|
|
#12
11-10-2007, 08:07 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: The San Jose Sharks are perpetual underperformers
I think you're in a better boat than me. The fans here actually care about hockey and we struggle to make the playoffs. At least no one cares about the sharks. stupid wild. We should be the frackin' yankees of hockey given how huge the market is. this puts me on life tilt.
it also doesn't hurt that our best player misses like 30 games with a groin injury every year. I can only imagine how much better we'd be if Gabby could stay healthy.  obligatory hot pic 
|
|
#13
11-10-2007, 09:51 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: The San Jose Sharks are perpetual underperformers
[ QUOTE ]
also, bring back toskala [/ QUOTE ] I still think back to when they basically threw away Mikka Kip, because Nabokov was "the next bigtime goalie" in their words. I said it was a mistake then, and well, obv the results speak for themselves.
|
|
#14
11-24-2007, 06:03 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: The San Jose Sharks are perpetual underperformers
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] also, bring back toskala [/ QUOTE ] I still think back to when they basically threw away Mikka Kip, because Nabokov was "the next bigtime goalie" in their words. I said it was a mistake then, and well, obv the results speak for themselves. [/ QUOTE ] [censored] this, at least your team didn't give up peter forsberg
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
