#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 600NL - I check to induce, and look what happens..
Why didn't you bet the river? Given his stats this is a simple 3barrel and he would've called with junk pair.
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 600NL - I check to induce, and look what happens..
i'd overbet flop and turn if hes that retarded, and yeah call river (i like c/c).
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 600NL - I check to induce, and look what happens..
Openshove river for value?
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 600NL - I check to induce, and look what happens..
[ QUOTE ]
I would have bet the river for value. [/ QUOTE ] yes. bet 2/3-3/4 of pot - fold is easier then too, cause u dont seem so weak... |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 600NL - I check to induce, and look what happens..
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I would have bet the river for value. [/ QUOTE ] I considered it, but decided that this guy would be valuebetting most of the hands he would call a bet with, and I knew that he would turn a busted draw into a bluff a large % of the time (especially on this board when he can rep something). Am I missing something Jam? [/ QUOTE ] I don't like a river bet at all, even against a half-witted spew monkey it's just too thin, and the times he decides to bluff-raise with a missed draw and you have a really nasty decision, just not worth it. Given your read I think you have to make the crying call. Also, given how the hand played out, I don't see anything but a J value-betting the river on his part, either. Edit: Come to think of it, I like a blocking bet of like 72'ish on the river. Re-edit: LOL nah, I don't, [censored] it just check and go from there. Kirk |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 600NL - I check to induce, and look what happens..
I'm really surprised at everyone saying call. I think its a really easy fold and I don't even think about it twice.
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 600NL - I check to induce, and look what happens..
I'd b/f the river(~85). As played I'd fold, odds are pretty bad. I really don't think he's bluffing enough in this spot, he's representing a draw and he probably doesn't turn too much made hands into a bluff.
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 600NL - I check to induce, and look what happens..
[ QUOTE ]
I'd b/f the river(~85). As played I'd fold, odds are pretty bad. I really don't think he's bluffing enough in this spot, he's representing a draw and he probably doesn't turn too much made hands into a bluff. [/ QUOTE ] The reason I don't like a blocking bet on the river is because there's very, very few J's Hero could reasonably have, and if Villain has the 9 [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] in his hand that eliminates another one, so I'd be afraid of getting bluff-raised if I bet. River could not be more perfect for a missed draw to bluff at, and given description in OP calling seems fine. Kirk |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 600NL - I check to induce, and look what happens..
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I'd b/f the river(~85). As played I'd fold, odds are pretty bad. I really don't think he's bluffing enough in this spot, he's representing a draw and he probably doesn't turn too much made hands into a bluff. [/ QUOTE ] The reason I don't like a blocking bet on the river is because there's very, very few J's Hero could reasonably have, and if Villain has the 9 [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] in his hand that eliminates another one, so I'd be afraid of getting bluff-raised if I bet. River could not be more perfect for a missed draw to bluff at, and given description in OP calling seems fine. Kirk [/ QUOTE ] I really like your posts in general but you keep assuming people can read hands when they can't. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 600NL - I check to induce, and look what happens..
Yeah I very much agree with Jamougha.. Your HSNL stripes are showing kirk, no way this guy is anywhere near that level of analysis.
|
|
|