#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 200NL: Bottom two pair from BB
I would bet/fold turn. River action depends a lot on the card.
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 200NL: Bottom two pair from BB
I agree with CDL that getting it AI on this turn probably means I'm behind, and the majority's line of bet-fold turn sounds good to me.
If a flop bet gets flat-called though, do we think most of UTG+1's range is draws and check-call a blank river (to induce a bluff)? CDL, what's your reasoning behind not liking the flop raise? I was hoping to take it down on the flop / force out draws / get it HU against the SB with position. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 200NL: Bottom two pair from BB
LOL at you making your title "200NL"
this is the no limit forum, so it is obvious that your hand will be a nl or pl hand. putting a "NL" in the title is unnecessary. Also, 1/2 makes more sense. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 200NL: Bottom two pair from BB
And what makes my post special compared to the other 4 posts you've replied to this week with 200NL or 400NL in the title where you didn't feel compelled to lol? [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 200NL: Bottom two pair from BB
[ QUOTE ]
And what makes my post special compared to the other 4 posts you've replied to this week with 200NL or 400NL in the title where you didn't feel compelled to lol? [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] i have not strategy advice for you on the turn because i play the other streets differently based on my style. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 200NL: Bottom two pair from BB
[ QUOTE ]
I agree with CDL that getting it AI on this turn probably means I'm behind, and the majority's line of bet-fold turn sounds good to me. If a flop bet gets flat-called though, do we think most of UTG+1's range is draws and check-call a blank river (to induce a bluff)? CDL, what's your reasoning behind not liking the flop raise? I was hoping to take it down on the flop / force out draws / get it HU against the SB with position. [/ QUOTE ] hoping to take it down is not good enough logic for me. If that was your objective then you might as well have ATC. I think that your raise folds out most worse hands with the exception of some strong draws and gets called or raised by all better hands. Also, villain can raise a lot of scare card turns with the lower part of his range and turn his hand into a bluff making this line extremely -EV. Furthermore you now have no way to control the pot and are playing for stacks or not seeing a SD if that is what villain wants. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 200NL: Bottom two pair from BB
this is a draw heavy flop. we have top and bottom, how are we not raising a flop bet here? if we just smooth call, we are giving everybody a chance to crack us. Maybe we can raise smaller since we def have a better hand than the sb, but not putting in a raise here is just asking our hand to get worked.
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 200NL: Bottom two pair from BB
I like your line to this point. Put $40-45 in on the turn. If he raises, fold. If he calls, c/f any scare on the river, c/c anything that looks like a blank. (There's something to be said for a blocking bet on a blank river, too, but I think that's setting yourself up for being committed.)
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 200NL: Bottom two pair from BB
Protect against the draws. Fire 3/4 pot on turn.
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 200NL: Bottom two pair from BB
[ QUOTE ]
he could have hands like JT or any two hearts. Fire and protect you hand. [/ QUOTE ] if he has j10 hes just made the nuts.... i near enough pot this turn fwiw |
|
|