|
|
#11
11-07-2007, 01:06 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100 WR > NL25 WR???? Dunno what to do.
If you moved to NL10k your results would be like infinite BB/100.
|
|
#12
11-07-2007, 01:11 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: NL100 WR > NL25 WR???? Dunno what to do.
[ QUOTE ]
If you moved to NL10k your results would be like infinite BB/100. [/ QUOTE ] hahahaha, gimmie 500k and we'll find out [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img]
|
|
#14
11-07-2007, 01:15 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: NL100 WR > NL25 WR???? Dunno what to do.
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] If you moved to NL10k your results would be like infinite BB/100. [/ QUOTE ] hahahaha, gimmie 500k and we'll find out [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] He said NL10k not NL500k dumbarse.
|
|
#15
11-07-2007, 01:28 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: NL100 WR > NL25 WR???? Dunno what to do.
[ QUOTE ]
5ptbb/100 for 30k hands can easily be variance also, higher rake at nl25 [/ QUOTE ] I do agree, however I think 30k hands is enough to know if I'm atleast a winner / loser at that level wouldn't you think? Even if my WR goes up or down slightly
|
|
#16
11-07-2007, 01:28 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: NL100 WR > NL25 WR???? Dunno what to do.
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] If you moved to NL10k your results would be like infinite BB/100. [/ QUOTE ] hahahaha, gimmie 500k and we'll find out [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] He said NL10k not NL500k dumbarse. [/ QUOTE ] I just wanted a 50BI roll [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img]
|
|
#17
11-07-2007, 01:31 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: NL100 WR > NL25 WR???? Dunno what to do.
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] maybe you're just not very good [/ QUOTE ] You are a moron sir. [/ QUOTE ] He's got a point... it's usually the correct explaination when people aren't winning. <font color="white"> Lori </font>
|
|
#18
11-07-2007, 01:31 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: NL100 WR > NL25 WR???? Dunno what to do.
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] If you moved to NL10k your results would be like infinite BB/100. [/ QUOTE ] hahahaha, gimmie 500k and we'll find out [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] He said NL10k not NL500k dumbarse. [/ QUOTE ] I just wanted a 50BI roll [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] 
|
|
#19
11-07-2007, 01:35 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: NL100 WR > NL25 WR???? Dunno what to do.
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] maybe you're just not very good [/ QUOTE ] You are a moron sir. [/ QUOTE ] He's got a point... it's usually the correct explaination when people aren't winning. <font color="white"> Lori </font> [/ QUOTE ] Of course, but does my OP / attitude suggest I think I am the Numbro Uno poker player and that im just getting royally unlucky? I have to say that over these 5k hands AA is a small winner (less then 20BB) KK is a loser, and QQ is a loser. So the deck is definitely not hitting me very hard and in multiple sessions I have lost money with trips, straights, and flushes (all 3 in a session) so some of it is bad luck. But I don't know if it can all be bad luck, also I have never expeiernced a downswing lasting for 5k hands obv or I wouldnt be posting this thread.
|
|
#20
11-07-2007, 01:35 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: NL100 WR > NL25 WR???? Dunno what to do.
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] 5ptbb/100 for 30k hands can easily be variance also, higher rake at nl25 [/ QUOTE ] I do agree, however I think 30k hands is enough to know if I'm atleast a winner / loser at that level wouldn't you think? Even if my WR goes up or down slightly [/ QUOTE ] Wow! Move down immediately.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
