#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Straight out of Sklansky, boom headshot edition (200NL)
i dont get it, why would you only want to raise to $135 or w/e instead of just shoving? do you think he calls with a lighter range? or do you think hes not calling a shove with T[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] but will call another $75?
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Straight out of Sklansky, boom headshot edition (200NL)
Shoving is kind of an overbet (we have 250 behind) and it might scare him away. I think I like a small raise.
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Straight out of Sklansky, boom headshot edition (200NL)
[ QUOTE ]
i dont get it, why would you only want to raise to $135 or w/e instead of just shoving? do you think he calls with a lighter range? or do you think hes not calling a shove with T[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] but will call another $75? [/ QUOTE ] if i make it 135 i am liable to represent just about any good diamond value raising, and figure to get paid off a higher % another thing to consider is that this player is prolly playing on close to case money that said, given all the info available i do think its a fairly close decision |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Straight out of Sklansky, boom headshot edition (200NL)
i think shoving is better, given your image and how bad your opponent is. not that its a slam dunk or anything, but i think it will net the most on average vs. this guy in this situation. he probably either calls or he doesn't, nomatter what you do.
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Straight out of Sklansky, boom headshot edition (200NL)
shove it in, hope he has the T
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Straight out of Sklansky, boom headshot edition (200NL)
i should add that in most hands of my own that i can remember where a bad player took this line, they were almost always:
a)bluffing b)never folding |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Straight out of Sklansky, boom headshot edition (200NL)
[ QUOTE ]
i should add that in most hands of my own that i can remember where a bad player took this line, they were almost always: a)bluffing b)never folding [/ QUOTE ] This is basically what I was thinking. He either has next to nothing and will fold for any amount or he has a decent flush and is never folding. I would just shove. I really don't think this is ever some marginal diamond that will look you up if you raise small. edit: if he bet like 40 I would like a small raise more, but his bet size looks more like straight value with a good diamond or a bluff. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Straight out of Sklansky, boom headshot edition (200NL)
I like shoving here.
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Straight out of Sklansky, boom headshot edition (200NL)
[ QUOTE ]
I like shoving here. [/ QUOTE ] |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Straight out of Sklansky, boom headshot edition (200NL)
I like shoving because of his line and that he's not a solid player so he would think that he must call a shove w/ the T[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] because he has the second nuts.
EDIT: Didn't see stack sizes. I guess I'd maybe raise to $150 or so. But I still think a shove may be best as I think it looks weaker. |
|
|