Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Science, Math, and Philosophy
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 12-20-2006, 08:37 PM
Skidoo Skidoo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Overmodulated
Posts: 1,508
Default Re: Why Was Sexual Reproduction Selected?

How could sexual reproduction be "invented" by a selection process?

Does anyone have a nice descriptive narrative?
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12-20-2006, 09:10 PM
Propertarian Propertarian is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: FOOD It puts me in a good mood
Posts: 1,867
Default Re: Why Was Sexual Reproduction Selected?

I also wouldn't rule out pure randomness; since natural selection is random mutation + fitness selection, a mutation that is close to neutral in overall value fitness wise can stick and spread.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 12-20-2006, 09:37 PM
chezlaw chezlaw is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: corridor of uncertainty
Posts: 6,642
Default Re: Why Was Sexual Reproduction Selected?

[ QUOTE ]
How could sexual reproduction be "invented" by a selection process?

Does anyone have a nice descriptive narrative?

[/ QUOTE ]
how about it it being discovered by a randomized searching process.

chez
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 12-20-2006, 10:29 PM
Xhad Xhad is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: .25/.50 6max - stars
Posts: 5,289
Default Re: Why Was Sexual Reproduction Selected?

[ QUOTE ]
How could sexual reproduction be "invented" by a selection process?

Does anyone have a nice descriptive narrative?

[/ QUOTE ]

Start four paragraphs down or so

Single-celled organisms that trade genetic material would be analogous to the discussion about "half-wings" and "half-eyes".

Wiki on bacterial conjugation
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 12-20-2006, 10:31 PM
Rduke55 Rduke55 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 2,958
Default Re: Why Was Sexual Reproduction Selected?

Lots of good answers in the thread on diversity, etc.

Sexual reproduction was a monstrous step in evolution.

Another thing to think about this is that sexual reproduction de-links traits from the genome. With sexual reproduction you can combine different traits from individual genomes. Now good and bad mutations can be separated so good traits from different lineages can be combined and bad traits removed.
If you reproduce asexually, the good and bad pretty much are always together, placing severe limitations on evolving. It's much harder to get rid of the bad mutations.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 12-20-2006, 10:33 PM
Rduke55 Rduke55 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 2,958
Default Re: Why Was Sexual Reproduction Selected?

[ QUOTE ]
I also wouldn't rule out pure randomness; since natural selection is random mutation + fitness selection, a mutation that is close to neutral in overall value fitness wise can stick and spread.

[/ QUOTE ]

This seems to be a theme we keep coming back to.
This depends on population size. In small populations this is much more likely (and probably accounts for a good deal of speciation). In large populations it's pretty much selection.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 12-20-2006, 11:29 PM
Skidoo Skidoo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Overmodulated
Posts: 1,508
Default Re: Why Was Sexual Reproduction Selected?

Chezlaw and Xhad,

Thanks for the replies. I thought it would be useful to encourage a schematic discussion on the sexual differentiation of an asexual population through mutation and selection.

This could shine considerable light on the topic of the OP.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 12-21-2006, 12:34 AM
Mickey Brausch Mickey Brausch is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,209
Default Ultra randomness

[ QUOTE ]
Here's something I don't understand about natural selection: why was the two-sex, sperm/egg congress paradigm selected? Many species have the ability to reproduce asexually, and I would think that that's more advantageous to survival as it's simpler. Can anyone shed some light on this?

[/ QUOTE ]Dear hmkpoker,

Start with the premise that humans are a small part of mammals who are a small part of vertebrates who are a tiny, tiny part of the fauna extant on earth -- and that the "paradigm" of "two-sex, sperm/egg congress" is not really that frequent.

Homo Sapiens is at the extreme right tail of the distribution of Life, as prominent an example of cosmic variance as any. Human "paradigms" are not typical of the ways of Life on Earth at all.

Regards,

Mickey Brausch
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 12-21-2006, 11:21 AM
Rduke55 Rduke55 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 2,958
Default Re: Ultra randomness

[ QUOTE ]
Start with the premise that humans are a small part of mammals who are a small part of vertebrates who are a tiny, tiny part of the fauna extant on earth -- and that the "paradigm" of "two-sex, sperm/egg congress" is not really that frequent.

[/ QUOTE ]

Um, in fauna it is.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 12-21-2006, 12:42 PM
Mickey Brausch Mickey Brausch is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,209
Default Small twiglet

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Start with the premise that humans are a small part of mammals who are a small part of vertebrates who are a tiny, tiny part of the fauna extant on earth -- and that the "paradigm" of "two-sex, sperm/egg congress" is not really that frequent.

[/ QUOTE ]

Um, in fauna it is.

[/ QUOTE ]Um, I ommited several steps to make my point. Tried to save space.

Cellular organisms; Eukaryota; Fungi/Metazoa group; Metazoa; Eumetazoa; Bilateria; Coelomata; Deuterostomia; Chordata; Craniata; Vertebrata; Gnathostomata; Teleostomi; Euteleostomi; Sarcopterygii; Tetrapoda; Amniota; Mammalia; Theria; Eutheria; Euarchontoglires; Primates; Haplorrhini; Simiiformes; Catarrhini; Hominoidea; Hominidae; Homo Sapiens; Sklanskyata.

Mickey Brausch
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:02 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.