#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Floppink zee nutz in zmall potz
all,
I'm not suggesting a slow-play, I am suggesting getting more value on the flop. I think we are missing it if we just bet out. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Floppink zee nutz in zmall potz
[ QUOTE ]
all, I'm not suggesting a slow-play, I am suggesting getting more value on the flop. I think we are missing it if we just bet out. [/ QUOTE ] If I have a hand that I know for a fact is the best hand, I am always hesitant to go for a c/r if there's no one I will know for a fact will bet. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Floppink zee nutz in zmall potz
if the villains are loose but folds on the turn, I bet the flop and check the turn to induce a bluff and raise the river
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Floppink zee nutz in zmall potz
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] all, I'm not suggesting a slow-play, I am suggesting getting more value on the flop. I think we are missing it if we just bet out. [/ QUOTE ] If I have a hand that I know for a fact is the best hand, I am always hesitant to go for a c/r if there's no one I will know for a fact will bet. [/ QUOTE ] He has to bet >50% of the time for the c/r to be of value. We have ATC in BB, we check--villain is going to bet a fair amount? |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Floppink zee nutz in zmall potz
[ QUOTE ]
hand 1: I think hand 1 is a standard check/raise? Villain is always betting. [/ QUOTE ] I'm sorry, but I just can't agree with this. First off, a check raise reduces our implied odds and may cause villain to fold on later streets. We also have NO guarantee that he'll bet, so we lose a LOT of value if he checks through. Not to mention, giving up a free diamond is not the greatest play the poker world has ever seen. Nick |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Floppink zee nutz in zmall potz
Can you really trust a guy who raises 44 out of the big bling? [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]
Jam these suckas. That said We also have NO guarantee that he'll bet, so we lose a LOT of value if he checks through. Is a pretty silly thing to say |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Floppink zee nutz in zmall potz
On the First hand I bet. There's a decent chance that your opponent hit a piece of the flop or a draw and will come along. Also a 7,9, or Q can kill any potential action.
On the second hand I bet as well. Since you raised preflop your opponents expect you to bet the flop. It just looks to suspicious when you check a flop like that after raising preflop. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Floppink zee nutz in zmall potz
c/r'ing hand 1 is defensible in some circumstances (generally with reads) but checking hand 2 is a crime and if you ever do it against me I will post the HH in the NC thread just to make fun of you.
http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showfl...ue#Post11442155 |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Floppink zee nutz in zmall potz
[ QUOTE ]
Can you really trust a guy who raises 44 out of the big bling? [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] Jam these suckas. That said We also have NO guarantee that he'll bet, so we lose a LOT of value if he checks through. Is a pretty silly thing to say [/ QUOTE ] reason being?... |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Floppink zee nutz in zmall potz
I feel silly for feeling so stupid for playing so good.
|
|
|