21.5 BB/100 over 25K hands. How crazy is this?

[ffr]

ahnuld, I didn't follow what you wrote. Can you please explain what those numbers mean?

I was actually showing 10.75 BB/100 on my PT, but was told PT calculates the "BB" as big bet not big blind. So I clicked the "Treat 'BB' for NL/PL as Big Blind Amount" in the PT preferences and now it shows 21.5 BB/100.

THANKS.

[thac]

[ QUOTE ]
ahnuld, I didn't follow what you wrote. Can you please explain what those numbers mean?

I was actually showing 10.75 BB/100 on my PT, but was told PT calculates the "BB" as big bet not big blind. So I clicked the "Treat 'BB' for NL/PL as Big Blind Amount" in the PT preferences and now it shows 21.5 BB/100.

THANKS.

[/ QUOTE ]

That makes sense.

[MotorBoatingSOB]

[ QUOTE ]
ahnuld, I didn't follow what you wrote. Can you please explain what those numbers mean?

I was actually showing 10.75 BB/100 on my PT, but was told PT calculates the "BB" as big bet not big blind. So I clicked the "Treat 'BB' for NL/PL as Big Blind Amount" in the PT preferences and now it shows 21.5 BB/100.

THANKS.

[/ QUOTE ]

so it's 10.75 ptbb/100? this is not that crazy, especially over only 25k hands.

[ffr]

I'm not asking wheter or not this is my tru winrate. I understand that this type of winrate can't be sustainable over a larger sample size.

I was just trying to see what can be safely assumed from the results so far. If a player is at 21.5 bb/100 over 25K, can it ALL be based on a CRAZY good run of cards? That seems unlikely as well, right?

I was just trying to see what people here felt this type of stat meant for future expectations (if anything can be gathered from it, really).

[goofyballer]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
ahnuld, I didn't follow what you wrote. Can you please explain what those numbers mean?

I was actually showing 10.75 BB/100 on my PT, but was told PT calculates the "BB" as big bet not big blind. So I clicked the "Treat 'BB' for NL/PL as Big Blind Amount" in the PT preferences and now it shows 21.5 BB/100.

THANKS.

[/ QUOTE ]

so it's 10.75 ptbb/100? this is not that crazy, especially over only 25k hands.

[/ QUOTE ]

SERIOUSLY

[Majik]

[ QUOTE ]
ahnuld, I didn't follow what you wrote. Can you please explain what those numbers mean?

[/ QUOTE ]

He said that that running at 21 pokertrackers per big blind at 0.5 is the same as 4.2 pokertrackers per big blind at 1000nl

[jimpo]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
ahnuld, I didn't follow what you wrote. Can you please explain what those numbers mean?

[/ QUOTE ]

He said that that running at 21 pokertrackers per big blind at 0.5 is the same as 4.2 pokertrackers per big blind at 1000nl

[/ QUOTE ]

But I only have one pokertracker installed?

Should I order pokertracker stud or omaha, which one? My friend uses software called poker office and says it is better, is this true? How many ptbb can I get using it?

Thanks for all the good tips in this thread guys, I feel I have learned a lot.

[Chump Change]

ffr,

If you also know how to shoot a fish with a gun i'd say you're a renaissance man and total package.