|
View Poll Results: wtf??? | |||
LAWL | 85 | 47.49% | |
el-oh-el | 76 | 42.46% | |
BASTARD | 18 | 10.06% | |
Voters: 179. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1831
|
|||
|
|||
Re: truth
Yes, OH, that is exactly what I anticipated would happen and why I came out now.
|
#1832
|
|||
|
|||
Re: truth
[ QUOTE ]
I am giving a double vote to a confirmed villager of your choice. [/ QUOTE ] And what if that "confirmed" villager is the godfather like I said above? Wouldn't wolves be willing to take a 50/50 gambol on that? It's neutral EV and GREAT for deception. |
#1833
|
|||
|
|||
Re: truth
OH, with Antonius coming out today, which he should given the two night kills tonight, I think we can probably come to some agreement on a confirmed villager. I frankly couldn't care less who it is, because once people come to their senses and stop lynching me I will tune out until I am needed.
Why do you want me dead so badly? First, you are neutral, second you have enough sense to understand what I am proposing and that it is ridiculously bad to lynch me here. |
#1834
|
|||
|
|||
Re: truth
MOD-NOTE:
I haven't made a decision about whether or not "no-lynch" will be allowed. This hasn't been asked, but is something I was thinking about. Normally it would be something I support, but given the fact that neutral roles exist, im not sure it would be appropriate this game. This is something that I'll have to determine if and when the situation should arise. |
#1835
|
|||
|
|||
Re: truth
What's no-lynch?
|
#1836
|
|||
|
|||
Re: truth
Same as no majority?
|
#1837
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Insane Celebrity WW (And PS Mets SUCK!) Long Game!
[ QUOTE ]
As usual a bunch of excitement while I am typing a morning post. There are WAY too many claims of neutralness floating around here. (Presumably, enough roles went unused that everyone who doesn't want to admit to what he really is can find one.) Still not revealed are Vick, Rosie, Jeter, Dennis, Patrick. There have been at least THREE fake roleclaims from living players. (I, as it happens, am not one of the five roles above, but would prefer them to claim before me, to leave the threat of a counterclaim if they pick my role hanging over their heads. I very much doubt there are any other as-yet-unclaimed optional roles besides mine actually playing.) meanwhile, tokyo, how about you tell us WHY you think I'm the serial killer? You and books both look like good lynches to me. Lastchance, chuck, and maybe mark round out my list. [/ QUOTE ] wow dude, just wow. your play yesterday and now this? we have a confirmed non-village here and you play this? i said i thought you were the SK, not that you were the SK. only other sk could be chuck imo. mark put himself out there too much to be the sk. man this post just reeks. |
#1838
|
|||
|
|||
Re: truth
I WOULD STRIDENTLY VOTE THAT NO LYNCH IS NOT ALLOWED!
Winning as a neutral is nearly impossible as is, allowing no lynch means I might as well just give up and vote myself. |
#1839
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Insane Celebrity WW (And PS Mets SUCK!) Long Game!
[ QUOTE ]
can i lock books? [/ QUOTE ] |
#1840
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Insane Celebrity WW (And PS Mets SUCK!) Long Game!
btw sieg, my role is PRO-VILLAGE, not neutral, thx.
|
|
|