Hacker Attack (All Info Game Thread - Feb 19 Start)

[Nicholasp27]

stephen, u are getting lynched today anyway, so let us know ur peeks

[Zurvan]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Stephen

I think you should reveal them. Remember, you can only be manipulated if the wolves correctly guess who you're peeking

[/ QUOTE ]

It's pretty easy for wolves to render a known good seer's future peeks worthless.

[/ QUOTE ]

How?

They'd have to guess which player you're going to peek.

That's not easy at all.

[Zurvan]

[ QUOTE ]
Oh wait, i thought about peeking DMK but didn't. I pay goot attention.

I have Xoom, Amp and Antidan as villagers.

[/ QUOTE ]

Who's your 4th peek?

[Nez477]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Oh wait, i thought about peeking DMK but didn't. I pay goot attention.

I have Xoom, Amp and Antidan as villagers.

[/ QUOTE ]

For the sake of my nittiness, can you give us all your peeks & the order?

[/ QUOTE ]

Happy peeked the following:

n1-Xoom
n2-Antidan

I peeked the following

n3-Soah (dead)
n4-Amplify

All villager.

[Neil S]

[ QUOTE ]
They'd have to guess which player you're going to peek.

That's not easy at all.

[/ QUOTE ]
It gets easier when you have 6 shots at it, you can't peek yourself, and you're presumably not going to waste a peek by peeking the dead or those you already peeked.

[Thebram]

[ QUOTE ]
stephen, u are getting lynched today anyway, so let us know ur peeks

[/ QUOTE ]

why should today be any different than the last 4 days regarding stephen? dollars to donuts stephen is alive tomorrow

Also, evils have an opportunity to dilute our conclusions by providing conflicting fake peeks with possible seers.

Be careful about drawing conclusions based on other people's peeks.

Because of this, I would imagine some evils will hold off on providing their peeks so that they can better manufacture them as more people come out

based on zurvan's spreadsheet, I like
books
luckay
xorbie

[Zurvan]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
They'd have to guess which player you're going to peek.

That's not easy at all.

[/ QUOTE ]
It gets easier when you have 6 shots at it, you can't peek yourself, and you're presumably not going to waste a peek by peeking the dead or those you already peeked.

[/ QUOTE ]

Quite frankly, i think a few of you are making way too big of a deal about this.

If anybody who thinks they're a useful seer won't reveal their peeks because they're afraid of them getting manipulated, we're gonna lose the game.

[Neil S]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
They'd have to guess which player you're going to peek.

That's not easy at all.

[/ QUOTE ]
It gets easier when you have 6 shots at it, you can't peek yourself, and you're presumably not going to waste a peek by peeking the dead or those you already peeked.

[/ QUOTE ]

Quite frankly, i think a few of you are making way too big of a deal about this.

If anybody who thinks they're a useful seer won't reveal their peeks because they're afraid of them getting manipulated, we're gonna lose the game.

[/ QUOTE ]
Never say never, but waiting until the peeks are actionable may be best. I'm really not sure though. I revealed mine, and for all I know I'm a useful seer, so take it for what it's worth.

[xorbie]

[ QUOTE ]
Oh wait, i thought about peeking DMK but didn't. I pay goot attention.

I have Xoom, Amp and Antidan as villagers.

[/ QUOTE ]

wtf

[xorbie]

zurvan,

what i have a problem with is stuff like "we KNOW blah is blah". if every useful seer (real seer or paranoid) just gets ONE peek messed up, we lose another day of lynching. if every paranoid/naive seer gets just ONE peek messed up, we lose another day of lynching.

obviously we are going to have to trust the peeks, because without that we have no real weapon (and are sucking enough as is). just that throwing ppl out offhand seems really bad.