#171
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Durrrr playing 10-20nl
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] fsu, how can you say bluff is consistantly right, when he is assuming that raptor is backing durrr? its a ridiculous assumption which he is passing off as a fact. [/ QUOTE ] i hear raptor is in the business of backing people... [/ QUOTE ] I heard he's backing you at eating food off the ground. |
#172
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Durrrr playing 10-20nl
[ QUOTE ]
I sat down and saw this thread and decided to read the whole thing. That's a half hour of my life that I will never get back [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img] go [censored] your mother 2+2 [/ QUOTE ] |
#173
|
|||
|
|||
Biggest swinging
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Bluffthis is right pretty much every time he gets into an argument, but since he isnt that popular and doesnt post ginormous wins, nobody wants to listen. They'd rather just blindly follow whoever is making the big bucks that month. [/ QUOTE ] Hardly. His logic is often times very shady, and he makes ridiculous assumptions about the people who disagree with him. [/ QUOTE ]I'd speculate that Bluffy usually runs on high blood pressure, which makes him post up some truly (and unintentionally) funny stuff. He knows that himself. But his PLO advice is generally flawless in its logic. Bluffy's many PLO detractors ignore the poker and get caught up in dick length comparisons. Mickey Brausch |
#174
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Biggest swinging
Sorry to sound like a broken track but his assertion that shoving in pre is superior to calling and reassessing on the flop, given that your opponent will shove ANY flop is deeply, deeply logically flawed.
|
#175
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Biggest swinging
[ QUOTE ]
His assertion that shoving in pre is superior to calling and reassessing on the flop, given that your opponent will shove ANY flop is deeply, deeply logically flawed. [/ QUOTE ] "...his PLO advice is generally flawless in its logic." |
|
|