|
View Poll Results: Do you tan? | |||
Yes | 7 | 16.28% | |
No | 14 | 32.56% | |
No, but my significant other does | 0 | 0% | |
No, but I'd consider it | 4 | 9.30% | |
Tanning is gay, dude | 18 | 41.86% | |
Voters: 43. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#171
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 1-table S&Gs - your feedback requested
[ QUOTE ]
they also cause regs to play more making the games worse. [/ QUOTE ] so does lowering the rake[img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] |
#172
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 1-table S&Gs - your feedback requested
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] sippin is saying that ppl can share accounts to win ldrboards I think. [/ QUOTE ] they also cause regs to play more making the games worse. [/ QUOTE ] Which I'd be willing to put up with if the games weren't already ridiculously regular filled. More [censored] promotions isn't the solution boys. The Supernova Elite one is bad enough for the games (ignore this if you play 60s-) Ryan [/ QUOTE ] I see your point but what if I plan on being one of the highest volume players on Stars next year? |
#173
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 1-table S&Gs - your feedback requested
Uhh, then you should want easier games so you can make a billion dollars?
|
#174
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 1-table S&Gs - your feedback requested
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] sippin is saying that ppl can share accounts to win ldrboards I think. [/ QUOTE ] they also cause regs to play more making the games worse. [/ QUOTE ] Which I'd be willing to put up with if the games weren't already ridiculously regular filled. More [censored] promotions isn't the solution boys. The Supernova Elite one is bad enough for the games (ignore this if you play 60s-) Ryan [/ QUOTE ] I see your point but what if I plan on being one of the highest volume players on Stars next year? [/ QUOTE ] then leaderboards and gimmicky promotions make you very happy? |
#175
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 1-table S&Gs - your feedback requested
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] they also cause regs to play more making the games worse. [/ QUOTE ] so does lowering the rake[img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] I just knew some dunce would bring this up [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] Lower rake is going to save a high volume player an incredible amount of money compared to a silly SNG leaderboard. Has everyone forgot how hard the games were during the stupid double points promotion? |
#176
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 1-table S&Gs - your feedback requested
Keep the antes.
If you change anything it should be to add in a filter for 6max/9max and for turbo/regular games. I hate accidentally registering for the wrong game and this could easily be implemented and make a lot of people (particularly the players who play high volume and pay the most rake) very happy. |
#177
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 1-table S&Gs - your feedback requested
Obv I would prefer lower rake. I just don't see it happening. Getting some kind of promotion seems really good to me instead of nothing extra.
Edit: 9 vs 6 max filter would be killer! |
#178
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 1-table S&Gs - your feedback requested
How about having some sort of cash bonus if anyone wins like the first 5 hands of a tourny, 5 hands in a row in the first level, or something like that?
|
#179
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 1-table S&Gs - your feedback requested
[ QUOTE ]
Obv I would prefer lower rake. I just don't see it happening. Getting some kind of promotion seems really good to me instead of nothing extra. Edit: 9 vs 6 max filter would be killer! [/ QUOTE ] I just think that whatever piddly equity you would get from a leaderboard you would lose and much more from the toughness of the games. Ryan |
#180
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 1-table S&Gs - your feedback requested
I agree that further filtering for seats and speed would be awesome. I want my lobby to show 9-handed turbo and nothing else.
As for the 10 vs 9 handed debate, I guess it won't make a large difference either way. I don't quite see why 10 handed would give winning players a higher hourly, though. Maybe it would, I just don't see it. I'm mildly amused by the idea of a leaderboard. I used to like this idea. Like a lot. But now...I don't know. There are enough 20 tabling regs as is. Also, 150/300 level is great news. |
|
|