|
|
#1681
06-20-2007, 08:56 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Old-Timers Game (GAME THREAD)
Bobo is not a seer, why not chim, and who was peeked?
|
|
#1682
06-20-2007, 08:57 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Old-Timers Game (GAME THREAD)
bobo mets patton boiler fish dmk is seer-cleared, hbe
|
|
#1683
06-20-2007, 08:57 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Old-Timers Game (GAME THREAD)
[ QUOTE ]
BTW, Shorty, saying the 1 person I will not vote for does not mean I am going to vote for any or all of the other 5. I suspect others feel the same way. I think it made a lot more sense for everyone to list <u>everyone</u> they would not vote for, so we could see if there was anyone that the a majority was willing to vote for. By changing gears, we have lost that approach. [/ QUOTE ] Is it really so bad to take my word for it that lynching from that list of 6 is the best path for the village to take?
|
|
#1684
06-20-2007, 08:57 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Old-Timers Game (GAME THREAD)
[ QUOTE ]
Bobo is not a seer, why not chim, and who was peeked? [/ QUOTE ] read my reasoning on chim, don't vote bobo, and dmk and xorbie were both peeked as village do you want me to vote you?
|
|
#1685
06-20-2007, 08:58 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Old-Timers Game (GAME THREAD)
[ QUOTE ]
BTW, Shorty, saying the 1 person I will not vote for does not mean I am going to vote for any or all of the other 5. I suspect others feel the same way. I think it made a lot more sense for everyone to list <u>everyone</u> they would not vote for, so we could see if there was anyone that the a majority was willing to vote for. By changing gears, we have lost that approach. [/ QUOTE ]
|
|
#1686
06-20-2007, 08:58 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Old-Timers Game (GAME THREAD)
[ QUOTE ]
"Somehow he got himself off the lynching block.." A seer came out. And cleared him. [/ QUOTE ] shorty and eskimo are not clear. we cant lynch them today, but they definitely arent cleared.
|
|
#1687
06-20-2007, 08:58 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Old-Timers Game (GAME THREAD)
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] BTW, Shorty, saying the 1 person I will not vote for does not mean I am going to vote for any or all of the other 5. I suspect others feel the same way. I think it made a lot more sense for everyone to list <u>everyone</u> they would not vote for, so we could see if there was anyone that the a majority was willing to vote for. By changing gears, we have lost that approach. [/ QUOTE ] [/ QUOTE ]
|
|
#1688
06-20-2007, 08:58 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Old-Timers Game (GAME THREAD)
btw, i think these plans are exploitable
let's just vote for whom u are willing to lynch; get 2-3 wagons with 7+ votes each and see where people really are at it's easy to put a wolf or two on ur 'will lynch' list
|
|
#1689
06-20-2007, 08:59 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Old-Timers Game (GAME THREAD)
Shortline, if traz=seer --> patton=villager, and traz=wolf --> fish=wolf, wouldn't it make more sense to wait on both of them until tomorrow? He'll either be dead by morning, and then we can lynch patton, or he won't and then we can go traz->fish, barring seer info ot the contrary.
What's wrong with killing boiler again?
|
|
#1690
06-20-2007, 08:59 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Old-Timers Game (GAME THREAD)
I think I am reading this thread more closely than anyone, and I think I am playing relatively well and with pretty good insight. I would much rather have a village follow my list than, for example, Patrick Duffy's, who is:
(a) Suspicious (b) Not seer-cleared (c) Putting peeked villagers on his lynch list (d) Putting CHIM? on his lynch list for today
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
