![]() |
#151
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Umm.... if the cops were not legally able to bust the door down, wouldn't the "Hide-in-the-closet" strategy be fool-proof?
One would assume they arrived at the door on foot of a complaint as to possible illegal activity, made their presence known, were ignored, probably gave warning, and with still no answer forthcoming proceeded to enter the premises in the only way available to them. By not answering the door you removed any doubt in their mind that some illicit activity was taking place. Time to invest in No Limit Social Life: Theory and Practice. |
#152
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I was watching the cops outside and telling all the kiddies to chill out as the cops couldn’t get into the house without a search warrant (and most judges don’t like being woken up to bust some underage drinkers). As I was saying this I was looking out the window and one cop who looked pretty pissed off came over and kicked down the door Chuck Norris style.
I’m pretty sure the cops didn’t have a warrant or any evidence of anything going other than a house party. In my extensive experience of being an underage drinker/gambler/badass etc. cops do basically whatever they want regardless of legality. One a side note one of my roommates thought it would be a good idea to jump out an upstairs window and hide on the roof. Sadly, there was no way down from the three story roof beside jumping which he did not have the courage to do. The fire department eventually showed up with their retractable ladders(the ones that come off the top of the truck), and some cops came up to the roof to arrest all the ‘climbers’. On the bright side since EM2 was in jail I got to sleep in his bed with two girls. |
#153
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
On the bright side since EM2 was in jail I got to sleep in his bed with two girls. [/ QUOTE ] pics of 2 girls with you edited out, plz. |
#154
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
On the bright side since EM2 was in jail I got to sleep in his bed [/ QUOTE ] How long have you been waiting to do that? |
#155
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] LOL at 'land of the free' - get arrested for having a party on private property?? wtf?? can you guys not even drink <21 on private property? [/ QUOTE ] qft [/ QUOTE ] The 2007 Index Freedom Country Rank [Freedom %] Hong Kong 1 [89.3] Singapore 2 [85.7] Australia 3 [82.7] United States 4 [82.0] New Zealand 5 [81.6] Sweden 21 [72.6] So STFU Swede [/ QUOTE ] The fact that Singapore at rank 2 didn't make you suspicious really shows how much you know about the world. [/ QUOTE ] Not to mention that the list counts Hong Kong as a "country". HAHAHAHAHAHA |
#156
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[x] Poster above has a cool name.
|
#157
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
one cop who looked pretty pissed off came over and kicked down the door Chuck Norris style. [/ QUOTE ] [censored] awesome |
#158
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] LOL at 'land of the free' - get arrested for having a party on private property?? wtf?? can you guys not even drink <21 on private property? [/ QUOTE ] qft [/ QUOTE ] The 2007 Index Freedom Country Rank [Freedom %] Hong Kong 1 [89.3] Singapore 2 [85.7] Australia 3 [82.7] United States 4 [82.0] New Zealand 5 [81.6] Sweden 21 [72.6] So STFU Swede [/ QUOTE ] The fact that Singapore at rank 2 didn't make you suspicious really shows how much you know about the world. [/ QUOTE ] Not to mention that the list counts Hong Kong as a "country". HAHAHAHAHAHA [/ QUOTE ] You are an a-hole. #1 I reposted the correct index for personal freedom. #2 Knowing Singapore has a harsh approach to law breakers (I assume this is what you mean by 'world knowledge'), does not mean ipso facto their laws are unduly repressive, DUCY? #2 Hong Kong may not be a complete independent nation, depending on how you define 'nation.' But it is, at least, some kind of national hybrid, for now anyway. (you know, like Canada, for instance) |
#159
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] LOL at 'land of the free' - get arrested for having a party on private property?? wtf?? can you guys not even drink <21 on private property? [/ QUOTE ] qft [/ QUOTE ] The 2007 Index Freedom Country Rank [Freedom %] Hong Kong 1 [89.3] Singapore 2 [85.7] Australia 3 [82.7] United States 4 [82.0] New Zealand 5 [81.6] Sweden 21 [72.6] So STFU Swede [/ QUOTE ] The fact that Singapore at rank 2 didn't make you suspicious really shows how much you know about the world. [/ QUOTE ] Not to mention that the list counts Hong Kong as a "country". HAHAHAHAHAHA [/ QUOTE ] You are an a-hole. #1 I reposted the correct index for personal freedom. #2 Knowing Singapore has a harsh approach to law breakers (I assume this is what you mean by 'world knowledge'), does not mean ipso facto their laws are unduly repressive, DUCY? #2 Hong Kong may not be a complete independent nation, depending on how you define 'nation.' But it is, at least, some kind of national hybrid, for now anyway. (you know, like Canada, for instance) [/ QUOTE ] I think he's more referring to the fact that Singapore is a de facto dictatorship. This does affect the idea of them being a free country, DUCY? [ QUOTE ] Singaporean politics have been controlled by the People's Action Party (PAP) since self-government was attained. In consequence, foreign political analysts and several opposition parties like the Workers' Party of Singapore, the Singapore Democratic Party (SDP) and the Singapore Democratic Alliance (SDA) have argued that Singapore is essentially a one-party state. Many analysts consider Singapore to be more of an illiberal or procedural democracy than a true democracy. The Economist Intelligence Unit lists Singapore as a country with a "hybrid" system comprised of democratic and authoritarian elements. Freedom House ranks the country as "partly free". Though general elections are free from irregularities and vote rigging, the PAP has been criticised for manipulating the political system through its use of censorship, gerrymandering, and civil libel suits against opposition politicians. Francis Seow, the exiled former solicitor-general of Singapore, is a prominent critic. Seow and opposition politicians such as J.B. Jeyaretnam and Chee Soon Juan claim that Singapore courts favour the PAP government, and there is no separation of powers. [/ QUOTE ] |
#160
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
I think he's more referring to the fact that Singapore is a de facto dictatorship. This does affect the idea of them being a free country, DUCY? [/ QUOTE ] Who gives a [censored] about Singapore. I told you I cited the wrong index and reposted the correct link and ceded the argument to the Swede. I never said Singapore was a free country. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man and see, in general, 'reading comprehension improvement techniques.' |
![]() |
|
|