|
|
#153
08-16-2007, 11:21 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: POG MOLE - Isotopes Team Thread
I thought the mole was either Burns or Smithers. How did we have enough remaining characters for the mole to claim one?
I am confused. I thought that there were only enough roles that the mole had to claim the missing one in order to survive. Maybe there were 2 extra roles, and the mole was safe choosing either of them? In other words, how did we get all the roles doled out, and have an extra, and have the mole (who does not have a character) not choose something that was or would be claimed by someone else. We need to look carefully at the last few people to reveal. I have one particular pogger in mind who I think may have run a bluff on us. 
|
|
#155
08-16-2007, 11:28 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: POG MOLE - Isotopes Team Thread
[ QUOTE ]
uhhhh the mole (smithers/burns) will be disguised as a normal character. they're given a cover. so like, i could be smithers, but i'm disguised as ned [/ QUOTE ] I did not know they were given a cover. I thought they had to correctly choose a cover from the list that Nich gave us, not duplicating someone else's choice. I thought the mole was at a major DISADVANTAGE in this one, but it turns out that the whole thing was an exercise in futility. Nobody lied, Marge is the correct answer, OR, the mole is Marge and lucksacked into choosing the odd man out. Probability of mole not lying: 95% If mole lied, probability the mole was in the final 4: 95%
|
|
#158
08-17-2007, 10:57 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: POG MOLE - Isotopes Team Thread
btw, we did this first task like idiots
we should have done my simul reveal if there was >0% chance the mole would lie, then it would have been much better than what we did i hate this game already
|
|
#160
08-17-2007, 04:28 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: POG MOLE - Isotopes Team Thread
[ QUOTE ]
smithers/burns do not exist, they are alias's for the two moles. [/ QUOTE ] slightly moleish
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
