Two points against Intellectual property laws

[kniper]

dude, i seriously wrote like the longest response, and it got lost in the mayhem of my page being invalid. siiiiiiiigh

pretty much, sorry for calling you a troll, but you have to admit your response was better this go around. rules noted

and yeah, you are exaggerating "centrally planned economy" cause IP is diff from tangible property, and bleh. damn it.

/thread

good discussion tho, i fundamentally disagree with you anarcho types, but def i am more skeptical looking at patent now. you guys are very ideologically opposed to it, so it makes me curious.

[pvn]

[ QUOTE ]
dude, i seriously wrote like the longest response, and it got lost in the mayhem of my page being invalid. siiiiiiiigh

[/ QUOTE ]

THat was the software telling you that you lost.

[ QUOTE ]
pretty much, sorry for calling you a troll, but you have to admit your response was better this go around. rules noted

[/ QUOTE ]

It was the exact same response.

[ QUOTE ]
and yeah, you are exaggerating "centrally planned economy" cause IP is diff from tangible property, and bleh. damn it.

[/ QUOTE ]

Of course it's different. Trying to legislate it into compliance is no different than the Indiana legislature declaring that Pi = 3.