Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Sporting Events
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: Which do you drink primarily:
N. Coffee 25 58.14%
Espresso etc 3 6.98%
Girly Coffee 6 13.95%
Herbal Tea 2 4.65%
Tea (milk..) 7 16.28%
Voters: 43. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #151  
Old 10-13-2006, 11:58 PM
ridonkulous ridonkulous is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: South Bend
Posts: 1,305
Default Re: Bears 2006 Season Thread

This was from the Seattle Post-Intelligencer

Reply With Quote
  #152  
Old 10-14-2006, 01:13 AM
MyTurn2Raise MyTurn2Raise is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Evolving Day-By-Day
Posts: 18,508
Default Re: Bears 2006 Season Thread

[ QUOTE ]
MT2R is usually such a great poster. Weird that he's posting this crap. And I'm not a Bears fan.

Hope he's not betting money on this.

[/ QUOTE ]

ty

Nope...I just loyally troll the Bears threads. If you live in Chicago and try to be objective about sports, you end up hating the Bears with a passion....just happens.

The Bears fans here all know my feelings on this subject and I doubt any of them take me serious.




BTW.....

comeuppance in 2 days
Reply With Quote
  #153  
Old 10-15-2006, 11:22 PM
DougShrapnel DougShrapnel is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,155
Default Re: Bears 2006 Season Thread

Week 6
The 5-0 Bears face a team that the only thing going for em is their new stadium. I checked the depth charts of the bears and I beleive I have found a glaring weakness that Arizona's best bet is to attack. Longsnapper Patrick Mannely's backup Desomnd Clark has zero(count em ZERO) professional long snaps. If the cards can throw some different looks at Mannely, I'm sure that they can get to Clark, and book a win in the process. The battle at the long snapper position is my key to the game for Arizona. The number of times you will hear Bears and Super Bowl or Miami during the game is 44. And the number of times you will hear grass field and moves outdoors is 10. This is also the final score of the game Bears 44 Arizona 10. Cheer up cards fans at least next week you face Oak giving you the opportunity to shut up the only person on earth that thinks you guys are a worse team than the Raiders.
Reply With Quote
  #154  
Old 10-16-2006, 02:17 AM
bort411 bort411 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Constantly urinating.
Posts: 784
Default Re: Bears 2006 Season Thread

I'm pretty sure Patrick Mannely has NEVER botched a long snap in his professional career. Accurate snaps from him are probably the surest thing in the NFL. Actually I think one could probably make a good arguement that he is the greatest longsnapper of all time.
Reply With Quote
  #155  
Old 10-16-2006, 02:21 AM
RedBean RedBean is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,358
Default Re: Bears 2006 Season Thread

[ QUOTE ]
Week 6
The 5-0 Bears face a team that the only thing going for em is their new stadium. I checked the depth charts of the bears and I beleive I have found a glaring weakness that Arizona's best bet is to attack. Longsnapper Patrick Mannely's backup Desomnd Clark has zero(count em ZERO) professional long snaps. If the cards can throw some different looks at Mannely, I'm sure that they can get to Clark, and book a win in the process. The battle at the long snapper position is my key to the game for Arizona. The number of times you will hear Bears and Super Bowl or Miami during the game is 44. And the number of times you will hear grass field and moves outdoors is 10. This is also the final score of the game Bears 44 Arizona 10. Cheer up cards fans at least next week you face Oak giving you the opportunity to shut up the only person on earth that thinks you guys are a worse team than the Raiders.

[/ QUOTE ]

Great analysis..lol.

Seriously though, what is Jerry Angelo thinking not picking up a veteran backup longsnapper with proven experience in case Mannelly goes down? Why do we risk our whole season on the health of one guy?

These guys have worked to hard to turn to Clark in a high pressure situation if he is needed!
Reply With Quote
  #156  
Old 10-16-2006, 02:28 AM
Colonel Kataffy Colonel Kataffy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: lol lossoflivelyhoodaments
Posts: 2,606
Default Re: Bears 2006 Season Thread

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Week 6
The 5-0 Bears face a team that the only thing going for em is their new stadium. I checked the depth charts of the bears and I beleive I have found a glaring weakness that Arizona's best bet is to attack. Longsnapper Patrick Mannely's backup Desomnd Clark has zero(count em ZERO) professional long snaps. If the cards can throw some different looks at Mannely, I'm sure that they can get to Clark, and book a win in the process. The battle at the long snapper position is my key to the game for Arizona. The number of times you will hear Bears and Super Bowl or Miami during the game is 44. And the number of times you will hear grass field and moves outdoors is 10. This is also the final score of the game Bears 44 Arizona 10. Cheer up cards fans at least next week you face Oak giving you the opportunity to shut up the only person on earth that thinks you guys are a worse team than the Raiders.

[/ QUOTE ]

Great analysis..lol.

Seriously though, what is Jerry Angelo thinking not picking up a veteran backup longsnapper with proven experience in case Mannelly goes down? Why do we risk our whole season on the health of one guy?

These guys have worked to hard to turn to Clark in a high pressure situation if he is needed!

[/ QUOTE ]

Fer all you know, Clark is a kick ass long snapper.
Reply With Quote
  #157  
Old 10-16-2006, 05:23 AM
RedBean RedBean is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,358
Default Re: Bears 2006 Season Thread

[ QUOTE ]
Fer all you know, Clark is a kick ass long snapper.

[/ QUOTE ]

Apparently Angelo and Lovie think so, as they didn't address this glaring need of backup long snapper in the off-season when there were SEVERAL PROVEN viable free agents available to fill the role.

No, in their smugness, they chose to leave this position undermanned, cutting corners again.
Reply With Quote
  #158  
Old 10-16-2006, 12:19 PM
Colonel Kataffy Colonel Kataffy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: lol lossoflivelyhoodaments
Posts: 2,606
Default Re: Bears 2006 Season Thread

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Fer all you know, Clark is a kick ass long snapper.

[/ QUOTE ]

Apparently Angelo and Lovie think so, as they didn't address this glaring need of backup long snapper in the off-season when there were SEVERAL PROVEN viable free agents available to fill the role.

No, in their smugness, they chose to leave this position undermanned, cutting corners again.

[/ QUOTE ]

Oh my god. If they need, I can long snap for them. Its easy as hell. Its not like not having a back up QB. Also, there's probably a 100 free agents out there right now that oculd be signed if the need be.
Reply With Quote
  #159  
Old 10-16-2006, 12:26 PM
Case Closed Case Closed is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: just how dangerous is it for a pot to hold ice?
Posts: 7,298
Default Re: Bears 2006 Season Thread

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Fer all you know, Clark is a kick ass long snapper.

[/ QUOTE ]

Apparently Angelo and Lovie think so, as they didn't address this glaring need of backup long snapper in the off-season when there were SEVERAL PROVEN viable free agents available to fill the role.

No, in their smugness, they chose to leave this position undermanned, cutting corners again.

[/ QUOTE ]

Oh my god. If they need, I can long snap for them. Its easy as hell. Its not like not having a back up QB. Also, there's probably a 100 free agents out there right now that oculd be signed if the need be.

[/ QUOTE ]

I really think he is joking.
Reply With Quote
  #160  
Old 10-16-2006, 12:33 PM
Kneel B4 Zod Kneel B4 Zod is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Nobody roots for Goliath
Posts: 11,725
Default Re: Bears 2006 Season Thread

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Fer all you know, Clark is a kick ass long snapper.

[/ QUOTE ]

Apparently Angelo and Lovie think so, as they didn't address this glaring need of backup long snapper in the off-season when there were SEVERAL PROVEN viable free agents available to fill the role.

No, in their smugness, they chose to leave this position undermanned, cutting corners again.

[/ QUOTE ]

Oh my god. If they need, I can long snap for them. Its easy as hell. Its not like not having a back up QB. Also, there's probably a 100 free agents out there right now that oculd be signed if the need be.

[/ QUOTE ]

he's kidding, but long snapping isn't that easy.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:38 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.