|
|
#151
06-12-2007, 04:18 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: OK, Here\'s The Truth
[ QUOTE ]
NLH. 5K freezeout. 100-200 blinds. [/ QUOTE ] What happens if newhizzle tries to log into his account and calls Stars support before the freezeout is over? 
|
|
#152
06-12-2007, 04:22 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: OK, Here\'s The Truth
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] NLH. 5K freezeout. 100-200 blinds. [/ QUOTE ] What happens if newhizzle tries to log into his account and calls Stars support before the freezeout is over? [/ QUOTE ] *golf clap*
|
|
#153
06-12-2007, 04:28 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: OK, Here\'s The Truth
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] NLH. 5K freezeout. 100-200 blinds. [/ QUOTE ] What happens if newhizzle tries to log into his account and calls Stars support before the freezeout is over? [/ QUOTE ] *golf clap* [/ QUOTE ] I concur
|
|
#154
06-12-2007, 04:28 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: OK, Here\'s The Truth
[ QUOTE ]
A Paint version of what DS is doing to/with Brandi's 'popularity' ------NSFW (not a roll, promise) [/ QUOTE ] LOL...disturbing.
|
|
#157
06-12-2007, 04:34 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: OK, Here\'s The Truth
lol
|
|
#158
06-12-2007, 04:54 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: OK, Here\'s The Truth
[ QUOTE ]
2+2 is so surreally ludicrous. [/ QUOTE ] <------*sings "The Price Is Right" song in his head* [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
|
|
#159
06-12-2007, 04:55 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: OK, Here\'s The Truth
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] David, "Let me know who wants to lay 6-5 against her after I'm done." What is the wager? [/ QUOTE ] NLH. 5K freezeout. 100-200 blinds. [/ QUOTE ] Sometimes I cringe when I read DS posts and other times, like this, I think he is levelling us more than we realise [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
|
|
#160
06-12-2007, 04:56 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: OK, Here\'s The Truth
[ QUOTE ]
David can I send you the hand histories of when $30k was lost on Mark's account? These are the hands that Mark claims Brandi played, but she claims in her current thread was all him (after originally claiming she played them under his supervision). I think these hands will really help shed light on who is lying here. [/ QUOTE ] It was the hand histories that convinced me that Brandi was the one doing the most lying. The play was awful and not skilled player drug induced tilt awful. Just horrible call downs and bluffing in bad situations; it was painfully obvious it was an inexperienced player making those decisions. We know from the hand histories that: The loses occurred doing a single time period. They were at stakes that Mark never plays. No one could imagine Mark having any part in the decision making revealed in those hand histories. In order for Brandi's story to be truthful we have to believe that Mark sat behind her telling her what to do while she lost 4-5K. Then Mark continued playing on his own, at stakes well below his normal limit, until his account was busto. And Mark choose to lie about the entire situation. I have not seen them, but Mark says he has text messages (and can show you them today) from Brandi claiming she was winning (was she texting him while he sat next to her?) and we have people who have verified that Mark was playing in the card room at the time of these hand histories. Combine the above with Brandi's generally nutty behavior and her presence at the center of drama in several different situations and you have the reason why the posters on this site almost universally believe that Brandi is a pathological liar. Was what she did outright theft? Depends how you define theft, I guess. No, she didn't chip dump to a friend or transfer the money to someone or put a gun to his head. But she did chase loses with someone else's money while telling them she was winning. She knows that if she had told Mark, 'hey I'm down 5K, mind if I go play 100/200?' he would have said no. Sure seems like theft to me.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
