|
View Poll Results: how much of your networth is invested in poker | |||
<10% | 54 | 62.07% | |
20-40 | 6 | 6.90% | |
40-60 | 8 | 9.20% | |
60-80 | 6 | 6.90% | |
>80% | 13 | 14.94% | |
Voters: 87. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#151
|
|||
|
|||
Re: HSNL HU Tournament
it would seem like the logical choice. unless you've ever played 300bb HU matches and seen some go for hours and hours and hours...
|
#152
|
|||
|
|||
Re: HSNL HU Tournament
[ QUOTE ]
it would seem like the logical choice. unless you've ever played 300bb HU matches and seen some go for hours and hours and hours... [/ QUOTE ] so how does playing 3 at the same time change anything at all? avg time would be the same anyways.. |
#153
|
|||
|
|||
Re: HSNL HU Tournament
yes, but you dont need the average time. you need the average time of the 2nd or 3rd longest match. which is exponentially longer for 300bb than for 100bb.
|
#154
|
|||
|
|||
Re: HSNL HU Tournament
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] I think best of 3 w/ 300 is out of the question, but best of 3 with 100 bbs sounds awesome... [/ QUOTE ] i hate this idea [/ QUOTE ] why not do best of 3 300 bbs and 3 table? this seems like the logical choice.. [/ QUOTE ] That's a pretty good idea |
#155
|
|||
|
|||
Re: HSNL HU Tournament
I would love that but ppl seemed to dislike it.
All in favor/opposed to 3 tabling 300bb games for the initial rounds? Also if we do that do we continue it like that for the last 4? Also- is everyone ok w/ the payouts? |
#156
|
|||
|
|||
Re: HSNL HU Tournament
I like the 3-tabling idea...
|
#157
|
|||
|
|||
Re: HSNL HU Tournament
in for anything < 10k
|
#158
|
|||
|
|||
Re: HSNL HU Tournament
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] it would seem like the logical choice. unless you've ever played 300bb HU matches and seen some go for hours and hours and hours... [/ QUOTE ] so how does playing 3 at the same time change anything at all? avg time would be the same anyways.. [/ QUOTE ] I think raptor has a good point. If we are playing 1, we have all multitabled 3 hu before (im assuming, if you play mostly on stars you dont have the luxary of hu tables), then why not play 3? |
#159
|
|||
|
|||
Re: HSNL HU Tournament
3 tabling fine by me
|
#160
|
|||
|
|||
Re: HSNL HU Tournament
3 tabling is a bad idea because once you win one table and let's say your opponent has like 40 big blinds and 300 big blinds on his other two tables. Naturally you would ultra TAG on the 300 big blinds and just win the 40 big blinds table which is very unfair. I think it should just be 2 tables of 300 big blinds and a sudden death if it's a tie.
|
|
|