Garnett to the Suns?

[kbfc]

[ QUOTE ]
In my original post I said full strength, then you brought up the sas/dal series. I suppose we both don't know how to read, because you thought "full strength" means "not necessarily full strength," and I thought "Suns not on the same level as the Spurs" meant "Suns not on the same level as the Spurs." As for Indy/NY, the Pacers were the 2 seed so I thought they had homecourt, my bad. And I already explained that the Pacers/Celtics teams were retarded.

As for my quantification, if any of the Bulls teams played 100 playoff games against the Spurs ALL in SAN I think they would lose over 50%. Does that mean they are a worse team?

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm not going to debate this fuzzy definition of full-strength (were the Bulls at full strength when MJ had the flu?). Had Dirk been out, I would have DQ'd it immediately. Terry << Dirk. Anyway, throw it out. Throw out the PHX/LAL. We're at 2/6. What % would you expect to see?

This whole levels confusion is baffling. Looking at the entire NBA, PHX/DAL/SA are bunched together miles ahead of the pack. If you just look at those top teams, there is more detailed stratification. Is it really that confusing?

And as for your hypothetical, I don't agree. The Bulls would win.