Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > 2+2 Communities > Other Other Topics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #151  
Old 07-24-2007, 07:50 PM
Jack Bando Jack Bando is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: POG
Posts: 2,777
Default Re: Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows discussion thread (SPOILERS)

[ QUOTE ]
how'd the [censored] hat get the sword?!?!/

[/ QUOTE ]

A wizard did it. Seriously,a true Griffindor can pull it out of the hat when needed.
Reply With Quote
  #152  
Old 07-24-2007, 07:54 PM
delta k delta k is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: you know who
Posts: 6,007
Default Re: Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows discussion thread (SPOILERS)

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
how'd the [censored] hat get the sword?!?!/

[/ QUOTE ]

A wizard did it. Seriously,a true Griffindor can pull it out of the hat when needed.

[/ QUOTE ]

even after a goblin swoops it? if so, harry should have known this and not cared about giving it to the goblin since he could just use a house elf to get the hat from hogwarts and then pull the sword out.
Reply With Quote
  #153  
Old 07-24-2007, 07:55 PM
traz traz is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Sleeping on stacks
Posts: 19,775
Default Re: Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows discussion thread (SPOILERS)

I think the idea is the sword only comes to you when you need it, but it was very deus ex machina, as was alot of the book
Reply With Quote
  #154  
Old 07-24-2007, 08:18 PM
TheOneWizard TheOneWizard is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: One Downswing Away From Busto
Posts: 318
Default Re: Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows discussion thread (SPOILERS)

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
We understand it's a theme, that doesn't mean it makes sense.

The smartest wizard in the world would know to use house elf magic for their own benefit

[/ QUOTE ]

The thing is Voldemort hated any creature that wasn't a pureblood. He wouldn't use a house elf for any reason no matter what the situation was because he prided himself on being above these creatures.


Also, patronuses had been used throughout several of the past books to carry messages. Specifically, Snape intercepting Tonks' patronus that was meant for Hagrid telling him to come pick up Harry at the gate in HBP. They were also used in other places to carry messages, but this was the best example I could think of. Thus, there is already groundwork for Snape to be able to send his Patronus into the woods and guide Harry to the sword. The patronus is more of a piece of yourself that can act out of your body than a shield charm against dementors.

[/ QUOTE ]

JKR actually addressed this question specifically a few years ago. The question stemmed from the end of OotP when Dumbledore told Harry members of the Order have better forms of communication than the "Fire in Umbridge's office."

Here's the story behind Patornus messengers:
[ QUOTE ]
Members of the Order use their Patronuses to communicate with each other. They are the only wizards who know how to use their spirit guardians in this way and they have been taught to do so by Dumbledore (he invented this method of communication). The Patronus is an immensely efficient messenger for several reasons: it is an anti-Dark Arts device, which makes it highly resilient to interference from Dark wizards; it is not hindered by physical barriers; each Patronus is unique and distinctive, so that there is never any doubt which Order member has sent it; nobody else can conjure another person's Patronus, so there is no danger of false messages being passed between Order members; nothing conspicuous needs to be carried by the Order member to create a Patronus.

And, as many of you have deduced, Dumbledore's Patronus is indeed a phoenix.


[/ QUOTE ]
Reply With Quote
  #155  
Old 07-24-2007, 10:06 PM
luckybacon luckybacon is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,430
Default Re: Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows discussion thread (SPOILERS)

[ QUOTE ]
I think the idea is the sword only comes to you when you need it, but it was very deus ex machina, as was alot of the book

[/ QUOTE ]

eh, i thought she set it up great with neville being able to pull i out. Showed how much his character has progressed into a truly brave wizard, etc. Also i liked the backstory to the hat out of the sword with harry in CoS i think. I agree though that Voldy putting it on his head was pretty weak
Reply With Quote
  #156  
Old 07-24-2007, 10:24 PM
Jack of Arcades Jack of Arcades is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 13,859
Default Re: Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows discussion thread (SPOILERS)

Off topic, but the part Narcissa Malfoy will be played by Naomi Watts.
Reply With Quote
  #157  
Old 07-24-2007, 10:57 PM
Glo Glo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: In my basement smokin\' weed
Posts: 690
Default Re: Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows discussion thread (SPOILERS)

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
http://diogenes-sinope.blogspot.com/...-spoilers.html

Somewhat amusing parody which covers my main gripes with it, the crappy convenient plot devices etc. That said I did enjoy it a lot in parts, and the battle of Hogwarts in particular should look awesome on screen if done well.

[/ QUOTE ]
Yeah, this whole thing was pretty funny...

"Then Voldemort's voice echoes through the night.

Voldemort: Brave fighters of Hogwarts, I do not wish to spill blood that doesn't need to. Therefore I shall withdraw my Death Eaters for one hour. Potter, if you don't want more of your friends to die, I suggest you come out and face. I'll be in the Forbidden Forest.... No Lucius, I told you a Big Mac, hold the pickles. Does this look like they held the pickles? I don't care what the clerk says, they can damn well hold the bloody pickles! Pick them off? No, their juice will still be on the burger, mixed into the special sauce. Just go back and tell them to get the order right this time. What Yaxley? Still on? Oh. You have one hour, Potter! That is all."

[/ QUOTE ]

My fav so far:

----------
Many miles away, Griphook the goblin is sitting in his living room gently stroking the Sword of Gryffindor.

Griphook: Precioussssssss.

Sword: Gotta go.

The sword disappears.

-----------

Seamus: Harry, we thought you were dead!

Harry: I was. I got better.

--------


Loved the whole thing.
Reply With Quote
  #158  
Old 07-24-2007, 10:57 PM
ASPoker8 ASPoker8 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Titletown (Boston, UF)
Posts: 13,738
Default Re: Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows discussion thread (SPOILERS)

Anyone think it would have been really cool to have Harry die after the long walk?

Harry sacrificing himself to kill Voldemort was actually really enticing.

The rest of the book could be the remaning ppl at Hogwarts taking out the rest of the Death Eaters after Harry and Voldemort's deaths.
Reply With Quote
  #159  
Old 07-24-2007, 11:40 PM
omgitsmatt omgitsmatt is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: pechanga
Posts: 195
Default Re: Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows discussion thread (SPOILERS)

[ QUOTE ]
Off topic, but the part Narcissa Malfoy will be played by Naomi Watts.

[/ QUOTE ]

Hot. The casting for the movies has been fantastic so far. Like the girl that was picked for Luna Lovegood in the OotP movie, she is absolutely perfect.

It's a shame Richard Harris died, the new Dumbledore is a lot more aggressive than I'd pictured Dumbledore.
Reply With Quote
  #160  
Old 07-25-2007, 12:44 AM
CharlieDontSurf CharlieDontSurf is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Just call it. Friendo.
Posts: 8,355
Default Re: Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows discussion thread (SPOILERS)

I think it is awesome that this whole time, since the first movie, Alan Rickman has known how the story will end.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:34 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.